iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) BETTER THAN Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | iPad Pro | Samsung SM-F966D | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 8,134 mAh | 4,400 mAh | +8,134 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 12 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 10.5" | 6.49" | 10.5" |
| Chassis Weight | 469g | 215g | 215g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)
Which is better: iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) or Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) (70.7/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 71.4 vs top rival 70.7 and Larger battery capacity: 8,134 mAh (+3,734 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) and Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) is equipped with a 10.5-inch display and 8134 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) features a 6.49-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) and Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) achieves a 64/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) scores 90/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24090RA29G (Xiaomi Malachite B)

BBK Vivo Y100 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB V2327 (BBK V2327)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
iPad Pro 10.5 (2017) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Samsung SM-F966D Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 512GB SC-56F (Samsung Q7) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
MarketTrendForce: Apple to capture a quarter of the folding phone market in 2026
TrendForce forecasts Apple will capture 25.2% of worldwide foldable smartphone shipments in 2026 following the iPhone Duo release, reshaping competition with Samsung.
GuideHere are the Apple iPhone Duo alternatives
Explore top alternatives to the $2,000 Apple iPhone Duo, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Xiaomi 18 Fold 5G, Vivo X Fold5 Pro, and OnePlus Open 2.