iPhone 16 vs SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44: Which One Should You Buy?
SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.7/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 wins overall; iPhone 16 takes 4 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV448090
- CameraiPhone 168268
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieiPhone 166040
- BatterySM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV445870
- DisplayiPhone 166462
- ConnectivityiPhone 166555
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 has the bigger battery4,380 mAh vs 3,561 mAh
- iPhone 16 has a sharper main camera48 MP vs 12.2 MP
- iPhone 16 has the bigger screen6.1" vs 4.58"
- iPhone 16 is lighter170 g vs 276 g
- iPhone 16 has a sharper selfie camera12 MP vs 10 MP
- iPhone 16 has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5
- SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 wins — BeastScore 72.7/100
The SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,380 mAh vs 3,561 mAh) and more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). The iPhone 16 is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (48 MP vs 12.2 MP).
Higher-resolution main camera: 48 MP vs 12.2 MP · Larger display: 6.1" vs 4.58"
Larger battery: 4,380 mAh vs 3,561 mAh · More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB
Common questions
Which is better: iPhone 16 or SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44?
The SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (4,380 mAh vs 3,561 mAh) and more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). The iPhone 16 is worth a look if you prefer its sharper main camera (48 MP vs 12.2 MP). BeastScore: iPhone 16 71.7/100, SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 72.7/100.
What are the main battery and display differences between iPhone 16 and SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44?
iPhone 16 has a 6.1-inch display and 3561 mAh battery. SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 has a 4.58-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.
How do iPhone 16 and SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 compare for speed?
iPhone 16 scores 80/100 for performance; SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones

Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)

iPhone 13 Pro Max
Google Pixel 9 Pro 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB GWVK6 (Google Caiman)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Poco X7 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 24095PCADI (Xiaomi Malachite C)

BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 17
iPhone 14 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 15 vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 vs iPhone 16e
iPhone 16 Pro vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 Plus vs iPhone 16
iPhone 16 vs Samsung SM-F9660 Galaxy Z Fold7 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK TW 1TB (Samsung Q7)
SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44 vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Gear for the SM-F900J Galaxy Fold WiMAX 2+ 512GB SCV44
All Amazon Finds →Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Flagship Monitor ShootoutSamsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)
A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.
Read →
GuideHere are the Apple iPhone Duo alternatives
Explore top alternatives to the $2,000 Apple iPhone Duo, including the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Xiaomi 18 Fold 5G, Vivo X Fold5 Pro, and OnePlus Open 2.
Read →