BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Micromax Funbook Talk P360 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Micromax Funbook Talk P360 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Micromax

Micromax Funbook Talk P360

Micromax Funbook Talk P360
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Micromax Funbook Talk P360?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Micromax Funbook Talk P360
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORMicromax FunbookSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,000 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight150g271g150g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Micromax Funbook Talk P360:
  • 121g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+1,400 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationMicromax Funbook Talk P360Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.0.4Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
soc1.0 GHz Cortex-A8Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb212
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayTFT 7" (480x800 pixels) 133 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g150271
os version4.0.411
battery mah30004400
release date2013-02-012021-08-01
storage options gb2256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Micromax Funbook Talk P360:
Lighter body: 150g (121g lighter in hand)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 72.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+1,400 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Micromax Funbook Talk P360 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Micromax Funbook Talk P360 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Micromax Funbook Talk P360 (72.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 72.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+1,400 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Micromax Funbook Talk P360 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Micromax Funbook Talk P360 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3000 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Micromax Funbook Talk P360 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Micromax Funbook Talk P360 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →
Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)Definitive Audio Guide 2026
16 min read

Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)

We stress-test the four titans of true wireless audio across low-frequency subway rumble, vocal babble attenuation, clinical hearing aid acoustic profiling, LDAC vs. aptX Lossless throughput, and real-world battery endurance.

Read Analysis →
Apple iPad Pro M4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 11: The Definitive Flagship OLED Tablet & 2-in-1 Architecture, Tandem OLED, NPU Silicon, Stylus Latency, and Desktop OS Convergence Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
16 min read

Apple iPad Pro M4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 11: The Definitive Flagship OLED Tablet & 2-in-1 Architecture, Tandem OLED, NPU Silicon, Stylus Latency, and Desktop OS Convergence Showdown (2026)

We test Apple's 3nm Tandem OLED powerhouse, Samsung's 14.6-inch Dimensity 9300+ anti-reflective slate, and Microsoft's Snapdragon X Elite Copilot+ PC across Geekbench 6, Cinebench 2024, stylus latency, thermal throttling, battery life, and real-world desktop multitasking.

Read Analysis →