OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766): Which One Should You Buy?
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 67.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSamsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)6472
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryOnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)8670
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,350 mAh
- Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) has the bigger screen6.58" vs 6.56"
- OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) is lighter190 g vs 240 g
- Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) wins — BeastScore 67.4/100
After comparing all the specs, OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.2 · Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more)
More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 4GB
Common questions
Which is better: OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) or Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) leads with an overall BeastScore of 67.4/100 compared to Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) (66.2/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 67.4 vs top rival 66.2 and Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+650 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) has a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) has a 6.58-inch display and 4350 mAh battery.
How do OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) compare for speed?
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) scores 64/100 for performance; Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
iPhone 14
Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2411DRN47G (Xiaomi Flame Blaze)
BBK Vivo Y56 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB V2225 (BBK V2225)
Oppo A79 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE JP V3 128GB CPH2557 (BBK 2557)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs Samsung SM-A166U Galaxy A16 5G 2024 Standard Edition TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-A166T (Samsung A166)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs iPhone 14
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339) vs Google Pixel 7a 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB G0DZQ (Google Lynx)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs OnePlus Nord N20 5G 2022 TD-LTE NA V5 128GB CPH2459 (BBK 2343)
Related articles
All articles →
Top RatedNordVPN In-Depth Review (2026): Speed, Privacy, and Streaming Tests
A comprehensive examination of NordVPNs NordLynx protocol throughput, Panama privacy jurisdiction, RAM-only server fleet, and ad-blocking performance.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
2026 Foldable BenchmarksGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)
A comprehensive 2026 technical breakdown comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, OnePlus Open, and Honor Magic V3 across aerospace hinge mechanisms, UTG crease dispersion, Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 silicon, Open Canvas vs. One UI 6.1.1 multitasking, Hasselblad & periscope optical sensors, and third-gen silicon-carbon battery endurance.
Read →