Pixel 7a vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q: Which One Should You Buy?
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Pixel 7a
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
Pixel 7a wins 4 of 7 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedSM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q8090
- CameraPixel 7a8868
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfiePixel 7a6040
- BatterySM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q7078
- DisplaySM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q7486
- ConnectivityPixel 7a9055
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValuePixel 7a8068
- SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has the bigger battery4,500 mAh vs 4,385 mAh
- SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q charges faster25W vs 18W
- Pixel 7a has a sharper main camera64 MP vs 12.2 MP
- SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has a smoother screen120 Hz vs 90 Hz
- SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has the bigger screen6.22" vs 6.1"
- Pixel 7a is lighter193.5 g vs 282 g
- Pixel 7a has a sharper selfie camera13 MP vs 10 MP
- Pixel 7a has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5
- SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q wins — BeastScore 79.1/100
After comparing all the specs, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 78.8 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 90Hz.
Higher resolution main sensor: 64 MP vs max 12.2 MP · Brighter screen: 1,000 nits peak vs 0 nits
Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 78.8 · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 90Hz
Common questions
Which is better: Pixel 7a or SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.1/100 compared to Pixel 7a (78.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 78.8 and Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 90Hz.
What are the main battery and display differences between Pixel 7a and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?
Pixel 7a has a 6.1-inch display and 4385 mAh battery. SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q has a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.
How do Pixel 7a and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q compare for speed?
Pixel 7a scores 80/100 for performance; SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 90/100.
Similar Smartphones
More Smartphones comparisons
Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 9a
Pixel 7a vs Pixel 8a
Pixel 5a vs Pixel 7a
Pixel 6a vs Pixel 7a
Pixel 7a vs Galaxy S23
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs Galaxy S23
Pixel 7a vs iPhone Air
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q vs iPhone 16 Pro Max
Related articles
All articles →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →
Flagship Camera ShootoutiPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)
An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.
Read →