BeastCompare - Smartphone Battles & Benchmarks
Home/Battles/POCO F3 vs POCO F4
Lab Benchmark Battle

POCO F3 vs POCO F4

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Xiaomi · 2021

POCO F3

POCO F3
81/ 100
Launch MSRP$299 USD
Xiaomi · 2022

POCO F4

POCO F4
83/ 100
Launch MSRP$399 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS POCO F4 BETTER THAN POCO F3?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

POCO F3
POCO F4Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORPOCO F3POCO F4LEADER
Refresh Rate120Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity4,520 mAh4,500 mAh+4,520 mAh
Wired Fast Charging33W67W67W Max
Main Camera Sensor48 MP64 MP64 MP
Screen Display Size6.67"6.67"6.67"
Chassis Weight196g195g195g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy POCO F3:
  • ✓$100 lower launch MSRP ($299 vs $399)
  • ✓Larger 4,520 mAh battery capacity (+20 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓48MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
Reasons to buy POCO F4:
  • ✓1g lighter chassis (195g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓64MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.67" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationPOCO F3POCO F4
1. Display & Screen🏆 POCO F3 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.67"6.67"
Resolution & Density2400x1080 (395 ppi)2400x1080 (395 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
Brightness1,300 nits peak1,300 nits peak
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 POCO F3 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 11Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128GB / 256GB128GB / 256GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 POCO F4 Wins Camera
Primary Camera48 MP, f/1.79, Sony IMX58264 MP, f/1.79, OIS, Sony IMX686
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.28 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens20 MP, f/2.4520 MP, f/2.24
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 POCO F4 Lightest Chassis
Dimensions163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm163.17 x 76.05 x 7.7 mm
Weight196 g195 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceIP53IP53
8. Battery & Charging🏆 POCO F4 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,520 mAh4,500 mAh
Wired Fast Charging33W wired fast charging67W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.15.2
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$299$399
Editorial Lab Verdict

POCO F4 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.2/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, POCO F4 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose POCO F3:
Lower launch price: $299 (save $100)
When to choose POCO F4:
Higher overall BeastScore: 83.2 vs top rival 81.3 · Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 33W
Upgrade GuideOwn the POCO F3? See if upgrading to the POCO F4 is worth it
Read the Verdict →
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: POCO F3 vs POCO F4

Which is better: POCO F3 or POCO F4?

POCO F4 leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.2/100 compared to POCO F3 (81.3/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 83.2 vs top rival 81.3 and Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 33W.

What are the primary battery and display differences between POCO F3 and POCO F4?

POCO F3 is equipped with a 6.67-inch display and 4520 mAh battery, while POCO F4 features a 6.67-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between POCO F3 and POCO F4?

In objective hardware benchmarks, POCO F3 achieves a 80/100 performance score, while POCO F4 scores 80/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read Analysis →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read Analysis →