BeastCompare

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Xiaomi · 2023

Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
91/ 100
Launch price$399
Samsung · 2025

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
92/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G wins 3 of 6 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Redmi Note 13 Pro+
2 wins
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
3 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraSelfieBatteryDisplayConnectivity
Redmi Note 13 Pro+Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. "From specs" scores compare only the specs both phones list. How we score

  • SpeedRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    90
    75
  • Camerafrom specsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
    72
    82
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
    60
    88
  • BatteryRedmi Note 13 Pro+
    90
    46
  • Displayfrom specsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
    85
    92
  • ConnectivityTie
    65
    65
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueNot enough data
Key differences
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a sharper main camera200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.67"
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G is lighter187 g vs 204.5 g
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G has a sharper selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G has newer Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.3
  • Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G has the faster chipExynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Redmi Note 13 Pro+
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+1,000 mAh)
  • ✓200 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
  • ✓17.5 g lighter (187 g vs 204.5 g), easier to hold
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationRedmi Note 13 Pro+Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDColor Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X (16M Colors)
Screen Size6.67"6.7"
Resolution & Density2712x1220 (446 ppi)~ 426 PPI
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz adaptive
Brightness1,800 nits peakN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm)Exynos 2400
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsAdreno 710Not listed
Operating SystemAndroid 13Android 15 16
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256GB / 512GB256 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Wins Camera
Primary Camera200 MP, f/1.7, OIS, Samsung HP350 MP, 50MP Main (OIS) + 50MP Ultra-wide + Telephoto
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera8 MP, f/2.2N/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens16 MP, f/2.432 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G Lightest Chassis
Dimensions161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mmN/A
Weight204.5 g187 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP68Not listed
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging120W wired fast chargingN/A
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 6EYes, with wifi-hotspot
Bluetooth5.3Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE
USB Port & SpeedUSB-C 2.0Yes, USB-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch Price$399Price on request
Our verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G wins — BeastScore 92.0/100

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.7" vs 6.67") and lighter body (187 g vs 204.5 g). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh).

Buy Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you want

Larger battery: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh · Higher-resolution main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP

Buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G if you want

Lighter: 187 g vs 204.5 g (18 g less)

Common questions

Which is better: Redmi Note 13 Pro+ or Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.7" vs 6.67") and lighter body (187 g vs 204.5 g). The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh). BeastScore: Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 90.8/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G 92.0/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G?

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a 6.67-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 4000 mAh battery.

How do Redmi Note 13 Pro+ and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G compare for speed?

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ scores 90/100 for performance; Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G scores 75/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy Z Fold8
Samsung

Galaxy Z Fold8

Apple iPhone Duo
Apple

Apple iPhone Duo

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google

Google Pixel 9 Pro

OnePlus 12R
Oneplus

OnePlus 12R

Xiaomi 12T Pro
Xiaomi

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo

Vivo X300 Ultra

Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Oppo

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G
Motorola

Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ 5G

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (China)

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 12 Pro+ vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 (China) vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Redmi Note 13 Pro vs Redmi Note 13 Pro+

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G vs Galaxy Z Flip 7

Compare →
vs

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G vs Motorola Razr 70+

Compare →

Gear for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE 5G

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: The Definitive Flagship Compact Smartphone Architecture, 6.3-inch 120Hz LTPO Super Actua & ProMotion Displays, Apple A18 Pro vs. Google Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Silicon, 5x Periscope Telephoto Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, On-Device Gemini Nano & Apple Intelligence, and Real-World Battery Showdown (2026)2026 COMPACT FLAGSHIP BENCHMARKS
15 min read

Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: The Definitive Flagship Compact Smartphone Architecture, 6.3-inch 120Hz LTPO Super Actua & ProMotion Displays, Apple A18 Pro vs. Google Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Silicon, 5x Periscope Telephoto Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, On-Device Gemini Nano & Apple Intelligence, and Real-World Battery Showdown (2026)

A comprehensive 2,500+ word engineering analysis, thermal dissipation benchmark, camera sensor breakdown, and battery endurance comparison of the premier 6.2-to-6.3-inch pro smartphones.

Read →