Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs vivo X200: Which One Should You Buy?

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2024

vivo X200

vivo X200
89/ 100
Launch price$849
Head-to-head

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G wins 3 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
3 wins
vivo X200
vivo X200
2 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5Gvivo X200
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedSamsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
    95
    90
  • Cameravivo X200
    80
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatterySamsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
    95
    94
  • Displayvivo X200
    89
    90
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueSamsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
    85
    68
Key differences
  • Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh
  • Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.67"
  • vivo X200 has more RAM12 GB vs 8 GB
  • vivo X200 has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
  • ✓Bigger 6,000 mAh battery (+200 mAh)
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo X200
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationSamsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5Gvivo X200
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo X200 Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Screen Size6.7"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED 2800x1260 (460 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz adaptive
BrightnessN/A4,500 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 6 Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedImmortalis-G925 MC12
Operating SystemAndroid Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR12 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB256GB / 512GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 vivo X200 Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.57, OIS, Sony LYT-818
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)50 MP (3x optical zoom), f/2.57, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A50 MP, f/2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP32 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/A162.9 x 76.7 x 7.99 mm
WeightN/A199 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G Wins Battery
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh5,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging90W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed30W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 7
BluetoothNot listed5.4
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB-C 3.2
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$849
Our verdict

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

The Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh) and bigger screen (6.7" vs 6.67"). The vivo X200 is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Buy Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G if you want

Larger battery: 6,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh

Buy vivo X200 if you want

Optical telephoto zoom (1 telephoto lens) · More RAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB

Common questions

Which is better: Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G or vivo X200?

The Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh) and bigger screen (6.7" vs 6.67"). The vivo X200 is worth a look if you prefer its more RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). BeastScore: Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G 89.3/100, vivo X200 88.8/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G and vivo X200?

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. vivo X200 has a 6.67-inch display and 5800 mAh battery.

How do Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G and vivo X200 compare for speed?

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G scores 95/100 for performance; vivo X200 scores 90/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →