Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G vs vivo X200s 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.3/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Vivo · 2025

vivo X200s 5G

vivo X200s 5G
89/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G wins 1 of 5 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
1 win
vivo X200s 5G
vivo X200s 5G
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5Gvivo X200s 5G
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    95
    95
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplaySamsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
    89
    84
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • vivo X200s 5G has the bigger battery6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G has the bigger screen6.7" vs 6.67"
  • vivo X200s 5G has more RAM16 GB vs 8 GB
  • vivo X200s 5G has the faster chipDimensity 9400+ vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
  • ✓6.7" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy vivo X200s 5G
  • ✓Bigger 6,200 mAh battery (+200 mAh)
  • ✓6.67" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationSamsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5Gvivo X200s 5G
1. Display & Screen🏆 Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.7"6.67"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (460 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 6 Gen 3 Dimensity 9400+
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android 15
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR16 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage256 GB1024 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/A203 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedIP68/IP69
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity6,000 mAh6,200 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedv5.4
USB Port & SpeedNot listedUSB Type-C 2.0
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G wins — BeastScore 89.3/100

The Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.7" vs 6.67"). The vivo X200s 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh).

Buy Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G if you want

Reliable all-round performance.

Buy vivo X200s 5G if you want

Larger battery: 6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh · More RAM: 16 GB vs 8 GB

Common questions

Which is better: Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G or vivo X200s 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G is the better pick for most people thanks to its bigger screen (6.7" vs 6.67"). The vivo X200s 5G is worth a look if you prefer its bigger battery (6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh). BeastScore: Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G 89.3/100, vivo X200s 5G 88.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G and vivo X200s 5G?

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G has a 6.7-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. vivo X200s 5G has a 6.67-inch display and 6200 mAh battery.

How do Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G and vivo X200s 5G compare for speed?

Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G scores 95/100 for performance; vivo X200s 5G scores 95/100.

Similar Smartphones

Gear for the Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G

All Amazon Finds →

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →