BeastCompare

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE: Which One Should You Buy?

These two are too close to call on BeastScore — the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Head-to-head

Too close to call: 0 of 5 categories each

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)
0 wins
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
0 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayValue
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedTie
    70
    70
  • CameraTie
    80
    80
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • BatteryTie
    95
    95
  • DisplayTie
    94
    94
  • ConnectivityNot enough data
  • SecurityNot enough data
  • ValueTie
    85
    85
Key differences
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) has the bigger battery7,040 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) has the bigger screen10.4" vs 10.1"
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has more RAM6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has the faster chipHelio G85 vs Unisoc UMS512 T618
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)
  • ✓Bigger 7,040 mAh battery (+440 mAh)
  • ✓10.4" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
  • ✓10.1" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
1. Display & Screen
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size10.4"10.1"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED FHD+ / LTPO AMOLED
Refresh Rate120 Hz120 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance
Chipset / ProcessorUnisoc UMS512 T618 Helio G85
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedNot listed
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory4 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage64 GB128 GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera Systemundefined MP, Triple Camera System
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)None (digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MPundefined MP
7. Body & Dimensions
DimensionsN/AN/A
WeightN/AN/A
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceNot listedNot listed
8. Battery & Charging
Battery Capacity7,040 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast chargingFast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listedNot listed
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedNot listed
BluetoothNot listedNot listed
USB Port & SpeedNot listedNot listed
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Our verdict

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE are evenly matched

It's a close call. Pick the Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) for its bigger battery (7,040 mAh vs 6,600 mAh) and bigger screen (10.4" vs 10.1"), or the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE for its more RAM (6 GB vs 4 GB) and faster chip (Helio G85 vs Unisoc UMS512 T618).

Buy Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) if you want

Larger battery: 7,040 mAh vs 6,600 mAh

Buy Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE if you want

More RAM: 6 GB vs 4 GB

Common questions

Which is better: Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) or Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

It's a close call. Pick the Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) for its bigger battery (7,040 mAh vs 6,600 mAh) and bigger screen (10.4" vs 10.1"), or the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE for its more RAM (6 GB vs 4 GB) and faster chip (Helio G85 vs Unisoc UMS512 T618). BeastScore: Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) 82.6/100, Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE 82.6/100.

What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE?

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) has a 10.4-inch display and 7040 mAh battery. Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE has a 10.1-inch display and 6600 mAh battery.

How do Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) and Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE compare for speed?

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) scores 70/100 for performance; Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE scores 70/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung

Galaxy A37 5G

Apple iPad mini (2024)
Apple

Apple iPad mini (2024)

Google Pixel 10a 5G
Google

Google Pixel 10a 5G

OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)

Xiaomi Redmi 13x 4G
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi 13x 4G

vivo Y200 Pro
Vivo

vivo Y200 Pro

A5 Pro
Oppo

A5 Pro

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)
Motorola

Motorola Moto G Play 5G (2026)

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) vs Galaxy A37 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Galaxy A37 5G

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) vs Apple iPad mini (2024)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Apple iPad mini (2024)

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) vs Google Pixel 10a 5G

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs Google Pixel 10a 5G

Compare →
vs

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022) vs OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)

Compare →

Gear for the Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2022)

All Amazon Finds →
Amazon FindsAirPods Pro 3 vs Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs BoseWhich flagship earbuds fit your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsApple Watch vs Galaxy Watch vs Pixel WatchThe right watch for your phone.See the picks Amazon FindsBest power banksFast charging for a full day out.See the picks Amazon FindsBest USB-C chargersSmall GaN bricks that charge fast.See the picks

Related articles

All articles →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism durability, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read →
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)Flagship Monitor Shootout
16 min read

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" vs. Odyssey OLED G9 49" vs. ASUS ROG Swift PG49WCD vs. LG UltraGear 45GS96QB: The Definitive Flagship Super Ultrawide & Curved Gaming Monitor Architecture, Dual 4K 7680x2160 vs. Dual QHD QD-OLED, DisplayPort 2.1 Bandwidth (UHBR 13.5/20), 240Hz Refresh Rates, 2,392 Mini-LED Local Dimming Zones vs. Infinite Contrast OLED, KVM Multitasking, and GPU Driveability Shootout (2026)

A comprehensive architectural shootout of the world's most advanced curved super ultrawide monitors. We compare Samsung's 57-inch Dual 4K Quantum Mini-LED titan against 49-inch Gen 2 QD-OLEDs and LG's 45-inch 800R curved WOLED across DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth tunneling, 240Hz motion clarity, text rendering subpixel matrices, multi-window KVM workflows, and GPU horsepower requirements.

Read →
Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?Tech News
6 min read

Pixel 10a Now $599 vs Galaxy A57 & iPhone 17e: Still Worth It?

Google quietly raised the Pixel 10a from $499 to $599 in early October, and Samsung pushed the Galaxy A57 up to $599.99 the same week. That puts three "budget" phones at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 17e. Here is what changed, how the three compare, and which one makes sense now.

Read →