BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch
Lab Benchmark Battle

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
92/ 100
Launch MSRP$649 USD
Allview

Allview Allwatch

Allview Allwatch
74/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) BETTER THAN Allview Allwatch?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)Winner 🏆
Allview Allwatch

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSamsung GalaxyAllview AllwatchLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity590 mAh100 mAh+590 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size1.5"1.28"1.5"
Chassis WeightN/A40g40g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
  • $9350 lower launch MSRP ($649 vs $9999)
  • Larger 590 mAh battery capacity (+490 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Allview Allwatch:
  • 959g lighter chassis (40g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 1.28" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSamsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)Allview Allwatch
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
gpsDual-frequency GPS (L1 + L5) for pinpoint trail and marathon tracking
battery590 mAh (up to 100 hours in Power Saving mode, 48 hours Exercise mode)
display1.5-inch Super AMOLED (480x480, Sapphire Crystal), up to 3000 nits peak outdoor brightnessMonochrome 1.28" (128x128 pixels) 141 PPI
materialsAerospace-grade Grade 4 Titanium cushion frame
processor3nm Exynos W1000 (Penta-core)
durability10 ATM + IP68 water resistance + MIL-STD-810H, built-in 86dB emergency siren
osProprietary OS
socAllview mobile platform 2016
ram gb1
camerasNone
weight g40
battery mah100
release date2016-11-01
Launch MSRP$649 USDPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 74.0 · Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+490 mAh more)
When to choose Allview Allwatch:
Lighter body: 40g (959g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch

Which is better: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) or Allview Allwatch?

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Allview Allwatch (74.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 74.0 and Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+490 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) and Allview Allwatch?

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) is equipped with a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery, while Allview Allwatch features a 1.28-inch display and 100 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) and Allview Allwatch?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Allview Allwatch scores 88/100.