Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Honor Watch ES
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) BETTER THAN Honor Watch ES?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung Galaxy | Honor Watch | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 590 mAh | N/A | +590 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 1.5" | N/A | 6.1" |
| Chassis Weight | N/A | N/A | 999g |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Honor Watch ES
Which is better: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) or Honor Watch ES?
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Honor Watch ES (78.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 78.0 and Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+590 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) and Honor Watch ES?
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) is equipped with a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery, while Honor Watch ES features a display and standard battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) and Honor Watch ES?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Honor Watch ES scores 88/100.






