Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE vs Honor Watch ES
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE BETTER THAN Honor Watch ES?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung Gear | Honor Watch | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 380 mAh | 180 mAh | +380 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 1.3" | 1.64" | 1.64" |
| Chassis Weight | 63g | 21g | 21g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 81.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE vs Honor Watch ES
Which is better: Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE or Honor Watch ES?
Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE leads with an overall BeastScore of 81.0/100 compared to Honor Watch ES (78.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 81.0 vs top rival 78.0 and Larger battery capacity: 380 mAh (+200 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE and Honor Watch ES?
Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE is equipped with a 1.3-inch display and 380 mAh battery, while Honor Watch ES features a 1.64-inch display and 180 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE and Honor Watch ES?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung Gear S3 frontier LTE achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Honor Watch ES scores 88/100.
