BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Honor Watch ES vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Honor Watch ES vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
HONOR

Honor Watch ES

Honor Watch ES
78/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
92/ 100
Launch MSRP$649 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) BETTER THAN Honor Watch ES?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Honor Watch ES
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORHonor WatchSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity180 mAh590 mAh+590 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size1.64"1.5"1.64"
Chassis Weight21g605g21g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Honor Watch ES:
  • 584g lighter chassis (21g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 1.64" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
  • $9350 lower launch MSRP ($649 vs $9999)
  • Larger 590 mAh battery capacity (+410 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationHonor Watch ESSamsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osProprietary OSWear OS 5 Powered by Samsung with One UI 6 Watch
ram gb4
camerasNone
displayAMOLED 1.64" (280x456 pixels) 326 PPI1.5-inch Super AMOLED (480x480, 327 PPI), Always-On Display, Sapphire Crystal Glass, up to 3000 nits peak outdoor brightness
weight g21
dimensions47.4 x 47.1 x 12.1 mm
battery mah180
connectivityStandalone 4G LTE cellular eSIM, Dual-frequency GPS (L1+L5), Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n 2.4+5GHz, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC Samsung Pay / Google Wallet
release date2020-09-01
storage options gb4
gpsDual-frequency GPS (L1 + L5) for pinpoint trail and marathon tracking
ram2GB RAM
weight60.5 g (rugged titanium frame)
battery590 mAh capacity (up to 100 hours in Power Saving mode, 48 hours Exercise Power Saving mode)
storage32GB Internal Storage
chargingWPC-based wireless fast charging (10W)
materialsAerospace-grade Grade 4 Titanium cushion frame with marine band
processorSamsung Exynos W1000 (3nm, 5-core CPU: 1x Cortex-A78 + 4x Cortex-A55)
durability10 ATM (100m ocean swim/dive) + IP68 + MIL-STD-810H certified, built-in 86dB emergency safety siren
health sensorsSamsung BioActive Sensor (Optical Heart Rate + Electrical Heart Signal ECG + Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis BIA), Temperature Sensor, Sleep Apnea, AGEs Index tracking
Launch MSRPPrice on request$649 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Honor Watch ES:
Lighter body: 21g (584g lighter in hand)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 78.0 · Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+410 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Honor Watch ES vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Which is better: Honor Watch ES or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Honor Watch ES (78.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 78.0 and Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+410 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Honor Watch ES and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Honor Watch ES is equipped with a 1.64-inch display and 180 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Honor Watch ES and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Honor Watch ES achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) scores 94/100.