Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water): Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 69.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M)
Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) wins 0 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.
Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie7272
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatteryTie8686
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) has the bigger screen6.66" vs 6.52"
- Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) is lighter192 g vs 200 g
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) wins — BeastScore 69.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
Significantly faster wired charging: 10W vs max 0W · Lighter body: 192g (8g lighter in hand)
Common questions
Which is better: Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) or Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) leads with an overall BeastScore of 69.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) (69.4/100), driven by advantages in Balanced specifications with Samsung hardware design and Runs Android with optimized security support.
What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) and Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) has a 6.66-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) has a 6.52-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) and Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) compare for speed?
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) scores 72/100 for performance; Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) scores 72/100.
Similar Smartphones
Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
iPhone 14 Plus
Pixel 6a
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN CPH2381 (BBK 2381)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2409FPCC4G (Xiaomi Beryl Citrine)
BBK Vivo Y28s 5G NFC 2024 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE TW SA AE V2 128GB V2346 (BBK V2346)
Oppo Reno6 Lite 2022 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB CPH2365 (BBK 2219)
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) vs Xiaomi Poco C61 4G Top Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 2312BPC51H (Xiaomi Blue)
Xiaomi Poco C40 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 220333QPG (Xiaomi Fog Frost) vs Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Xiaomi Poco C50 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 220733SPH / 220733SPI (Xiaomi Ice F) vs Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water)
Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) vs Xiaomi Poco C65 4G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB 2310FPCA4I (Xiaomi Gale)
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) vs Samsung SM-E076B/DS Galaxy F70e 5G 2026 Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB (Samsung A076)
Samsung SM-A266M/DS Galaxy A26 5G 2025 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE LATAM 128GB (Samsung A266M) vs iPhone 14 Plus
Xiaomi Poco C51 4G Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB 2305EPCC4G (Xiaomi Water) vs iPhone 14 Plus
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →