Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt): Which One Should You Buy?
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 73.4/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) wins 1 of 5 categories
Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.


Bigger shape = better phone.
Scores out of 100. How we score
- SpeedTie8080
- CameraTie6060
- VideoNot enough data
- SelfieNot enough data
- BatterySamsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)9692
- DisplayTie6262
- ConnectivityNot enough data
- SecurityNot enough data
- ValueTie6868
- Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) has the bigger battery6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh
- Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) has the bigger screen6.67" vs 6.63"
- Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) is lighter202 g vs 222 g
- Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) has the faster chipMediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 1380 5G S5E8835
Why buy each phone
Swipe ⇄Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) wins — BeastScore 73.4/100
After comparing all the specs, Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 73.4 vs top rival 72.6 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).
Higher overall BeastScore: 73.4 vs top rival 72.6 · Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+500 mAh more)
Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 0W · Smoother display: 120Hz refresh rate vs 60Hz
Common questions
Which is better: Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) or Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)?
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) leads with an overall BeastScore of 73.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) (72.6/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 73.4 vs top rival 72.6 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+500 mAh more).
What are the main battery and display differences between Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) and Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)?
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) has a 6.63-inch display and 6000 mAh battery. Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) has a 6.67-inch display and 5500 mAh battery.
How do Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) and Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) compare for speed?
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) scores 80/100 for performance; Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) scores 80/100.
Similar Smartphones

Galaxy Z Flip5

iPhone 13 Pro Max
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold UW 5G Global TD-LTE 512GB GGH2X (Google Comet)

OnePlus 12R 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB CPH2585 (BBK Aston)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB 24115RA8EG (Xiaomi Amethyst)

BBK Vivo Y78t 5G 2023 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB V2312BA (BBK V2312)

Oppo Reno13 F 4G 2025 Dual SIM TD-LTE ID V3 256GB CPH2701 (BBK 2701)

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
More Smartphones comparisons
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) vs Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) vs Samsung Galaxy M36 5G
SM-M336BU/DS Galaxy M33 5G 2022 Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 128GB vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Galaxy M34 vs Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356)
Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 2311DRK48C (Xiaomi Duchamp)
Redmi K60 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB 22122RK93C (Xiaomi Rembrandt)
Samsung SM-M356B/DS Galaxy M35 5G 2024 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 256GB (Samsung M356) vs Galaxy Z Flip5
Related articles
All articles →
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Read →
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Read →
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.
Read →