Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
WHY IS Motorola Edge 60 Pro BETTER THAN Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Samsung SM-T116 | Motorola Edge | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh | +6,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | 90W | 90W Max |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7.01" | 6.7" | 7.01" |
| Chassis Weight | 322g | 186g | 186g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Motorola Edge 60 Pro edges ahead with a BeastScore of 89.6/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Motorola Edge 60 Pro ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Which is better: Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) or Motorola Edge 60 Pro?
Motorola Edge 60 Pro leads with an overall BeastScore of 89.6/100 compared to Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 89.6 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 6,000 mAh (+4,500 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) and Motorola Edge 60 Pro?
Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) is equipped with a 7.01-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a 6.7-inch display and 6000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) and Motorola Edge 60 Pro?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Motorola Edge 60 Pro scores 90/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartphones Battles
Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) vs Galaxy Folder2
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 Pro
Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Apple iPhone Duo
Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Pixel 7 Pro
Samsung SM-T116 Galaxy Tab 3 V 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite VE 7.0 (Samsung T116) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
ChipsetQualcomm outlines the improvements in the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro's new NPU
Qualcomm has outlined the architectural upgrades inside the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, featuring a 45% faster Hexagon NPU with 28% lower sustained power draw for generative AI.