BeastCompare - Independent Smartphone Battles & Specifications
Home/Battles/SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Lab Benchmark Battle

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing display brightness, chipset benchmark percentiles, multi-camera arrays, battery capacity, and charging speeds.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2019

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
71/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,980 USD
Oppo · 2024

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB BETTER THAN Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GBWinner 🏆
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORSM-F900U GalaxyOppo Reno11LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity4,380 mAh5,000 mAh+5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor12.2 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size4.58"6.7"6.7"
Chassis Weight276g177g177g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB:
  • $8019 lower launch MSRP ($1980 vs $9999)
  • 12.2MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • 4.58" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603):
  • 99g lighter chassis (177g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 5,000 mAh battery capacity (+620 mAh more capacity)
  • 6.7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationSM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GBOppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
1. Display & Screen🏆 SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAM-OLED displayAM-OLED display
Screen Size4.58"6.7"
Resolution & Density720x1680 (399 ppi)1080x2412 (394 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 9.0Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory12 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage512GB256GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB Wins Camera
Primary Camera12.2 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens10 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight276 g177 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,380 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB C reversibleUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch Price$1980Price on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 71.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its advanced processor architecture and verified 68/100 camera rating.

When to buy SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB:
Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP · More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB
When to buy Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603):
Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+620 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 6.7" vs max 4.58" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)

Which phone is better: SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB or Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 71.4/100 compared to Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) (71.4/100), driven by advantages in Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP and More system memory: 12GB RAM vs max 8GB.

What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB and Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB is equipped with a 4.58-inch display and 4380 mAh battery, while Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) features a 6.7-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the camera capabilities compare between SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB and Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)?

In lab hardware evaluations, SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB scores 68/100 in camera performance, while Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) scores 60/100.

Trending Matchups

Related Smartphone Battles & Comparisons

Battle #171 vs 71

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
V/S
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #271 vs 71

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
V/S
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Samsung SM-F966Z Galaxy Z Fold7 5G UW Dual SIM TD-LTE JP 256GB (Samsung Q7)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #371 vs 70

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
V/S
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #471 vs 70

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
V/S
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 5G A3296 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 1TB (Apple iPhone 17,2)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #571 vs 71

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
V/S
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #671 vs 71

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
V/S
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Google Pixel 9a 5G TD-LTE 128GB JP G3Y12 (Google Tegu)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #771 vs 71

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
SM-F900U Galaxy Fold TD-LTE US 512GB
V/S
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Compare Both Phones
Battle #871 vs 71

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603) vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)

Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
Oppo Reno11 F 5G 2024 Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 256GB CPH2603 (BBK 2603)
V/S
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 256GB CPH2467 (BBK Larry)
Compare Both Phones