SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | SM-T116BU Galaxy | Samsung Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 1,500 mAh | 4,380 mAh | +4,380 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7.01" | 7.3" | 7.3" |
| Chassis Weight | 322g | 276g | 276g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Which is better: SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 or Samsung Galaxy Fold?
Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 (70.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 70.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,380 mAh (+2,880 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?
SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 is equipped with a 7.01-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?
In objective hardware benchmarks, SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.
Related Tablets & iPads (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
More Tablets & iPads Battles
SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 vs Find N 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Galaxy S26+
SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 vs Find N 2021 5G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB PEUM00
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs iPhone 17 Pro Max
SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Pixel 10a
SM-T116BU Galaxy Tab E 3G / Galaxy Tab 3 Lite 7.0 vs Mi Mix Fold 2021 5G Premium Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 512GB
Samsung Galaxy Fold vs OnePlus Nord CE6 Lite 5G
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
Deep DiveSnapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9400 vs Apple A18 Pro: The Real Winner
We compared the big three 3nm smartphone chipsets under sustained 60-minute gaming loads, measuring frame rate stability, power draw, and thermal throttling.
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
ChipsetQualcomm outlines the improvements in the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro's new NPU
Qualcomm has outlined the architectural upgrades inside the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro, featuring a 45% faster Hexagon NPU with 28% lower sustained power draw for generative AI.