Home/Battles/Transformer Pad TF103C vs A17k

Lab Benchmark Battle

Transformer Pad TF103C vs A17k

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle

Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄

Asus · 2014

Transformer Pad TF103C

66/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

Oppo · 2022

A17k

66/ 100

Launch MSRPPricing on request

WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Transformer Pad TF103C BETTER THAN A17k?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Transformer Pad TF103CWinner 🏆

A17k

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta

SPEC FACTOR	Transformer Pad	A17k	LEADER
Refresh Rate	60Hz	60Hz	60Hz
Battery Capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	Standard	Standard	25W
Main Camera Sensor	2 MP	8 MP	8 MP
Screen Display Size	10.1"	6.56"	10.1"
Chassis Weight	150g	189g	150g Lightest

Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄

Reasons to buy Transformer Pad TF103C:

✓39g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
✓2MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
✓10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

Reasons to buy A17k:

✓8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
✓6.56" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄

Specification	Transformer Pad TF103C	A17k
1. Display & Screen🏆 Transformer Pad TF103C Wins Display
Screen Type & Tech	IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors	IPS TFT LCD
Screen Size	10.1"	6.56"
Resolution & Density	800x1280 (149 ppi)	720x1612 (269 ppi)
Refresh Rate	60 Hz ProMotion	60 Hz ProMotion
Brightness	N/A	N/A
Screen Protection	Scratch-resistant glass	Scratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Transformer Pad TF103C Wins Performance
Chipset / Processor	High performance SoC	High performance SoC
CPU Cores	Multi-core high performance	Multi-core high performance
GPU Graphics	Integrated Graphics	Integrated Graphics
Operating System	Android	Android 12
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory	1 GB LPDDR	3 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage	1GB / 16GB	64GB
Storage Speed	High-speed flash	High-speed flash
Card Slot	No	No
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Transformer Pad TF103C Wins Camera
Primary Camera	2 MP	8 MP
Telephoto Zoom	None (Digital zoom only)	None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide Camera	N/A	N/A
LiDAR / Depth	None	None
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR	4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS	4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens	N/A	4.9 MP
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Transformer Pad TF103C Lightest Chassis
Dimensions	N/A	164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm
Weight	150 g	189 g
Build Materials	Glass front, metal/glass frame	Glass front, metal/glass frame
SIM Type	Nano-SIM / eSIM support	Nano-SIM / eSIM support
Water Resistance	Not certified	Not certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Transformer Pad TF103C Wins Battery
Battery Capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Wired Fast Charging	N/A	N/A
Wireless Charging	Not supported	Not supported
Reverse Charging	Reverse wireless charging	Reverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
Loudspeaker	Stereo speakers	Stereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone Jack	No	No
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi Standard	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band	Wi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth	4.0, A2DP	Bluetooth 5.3
USB Port & Speed	microUSB 2.0, USB Host	USB Micro-AB
NFC	Yes	Yes
11. Sensors & Security
Sensors	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass	Biometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite Features	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)	Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
Colors	Standard finishes	Standard finishes
Launch Price	Price on request	Price on request

Editorial Lab Verdict

Transformer Pad TF103C edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Transformer Pad TF103C ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Transformer Pad TF103C:

Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 6.56" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 150g (39g lighter in hand)

When to choose A17k:

More system memory: 3GB RAM vs max 1GB

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Transformer Pad TF103C vs A17k

Which is better: Transformer Pad TF103C or A17k?

Transformer Pad TF103C leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to A17k (66.4/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 6.56" for media & multitasking and Lighter body: 150g (39g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Transformer Pad TF103C and A17k?

Transformer Pad TF103C is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 5000 mAh battery, while A17k features a 6.56-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Transformer Pad TF103C and A17k?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Transformer Pad TF103C achieves a 60/100 performance score, while A17k scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Transformer Pad TF103C vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →

Head-to-Head

A17k vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →

Head-to-Head

Transformer Pad TF103C vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →

Head-to-Head

A17k vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →

Head-to-Head

Transformer Pad TF103C vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →

Head-to-Head

A17k vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →

Head-to-Head

Transformer Pad TF103C vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →

Head-to-Head

A17k vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Transformer Pad TF103C vs A17k

Transformer Pad TF103C

A17k

WHY IS Transformer Pad TF103C BETTER THAN A17k?

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Transformer Pad TF103C edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100

Frequently Asked Questions: Transformer Pad TF103C vs A17k

Which is better: Transformer Pad TF103C or A17k?

What are the primary battery and display differences between Transformer Pad TF103C and A17k?

How do the performance capabilities compare between Transformer Pad TF103C and A17k?

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A16e 2022 Premium Edition

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

More Smartphones Battles

Transformer Pad TF103C vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

A17k vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Transformer Pad TF103C vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

A17k vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Transformer Pad TF103C vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

A17k vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

Transformer Pad TF103C vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

A17k vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

Oppo Find X10 to feature dual 200MP cameras, Pro Max gets Open Gate

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)