BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Lab Benchmark Battle

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Lg · 2018

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2022

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) BETTER THAN V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORV405TAB V40Samsung SM-G736U1LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,300 mAh4,050 mAh+4,050 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor12.2 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size6.38"6.58"6.58"
Chassis Weight169g240g169g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA:
  • ✓71g lighter chassis (169g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓12.2MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓6.38" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736):
  • ✓Larger 4,050 mAh battery capacity (+750 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓6.58" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationV405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TASamsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
1. Display & Screen🏆 V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA Wins Display
Screen Type & TechAM-OLED displayColor PLS TFT LCD display
Screen Size6.38"6.58"
Resolution & Density1440x3120 (539 ppi)1080x2408 (401 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid 8.1Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory6 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage64GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA Wins Camera
Primary Camera12.2 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens8 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight169 g240 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity3,300 mAh4,050 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-bandWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedUSB C reversibleUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.2/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA:
Higher resolution main sensor: 12.2 MP vs max 0 MP · Lighter body: 169g (71g lighter in hand)
When to choose Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736):
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 65.8 · Larger battery capacity: 4,050 mAh (+750 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Which is better: V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA or Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.2/100 compared to V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA (65.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 65.8 and Larger battery capacity: 4,050 mAh (+750 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA is equipped with a 6.38-inch display and 3300 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) features a 6.58-inch display and 4050 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA achieves a 72/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) scores 72/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Samsung

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A17k
Oppo

A17k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

V405TAB V40 ThinQ TD-LTE US / V405TA vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Sony WH-1000XM6 & XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Apple AirPods Max (USB-C): The Definitive Flagship ANC Showdown (2026)Ultimate Audio Shootout
16 min read

Sony WH-1000XM6 & XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Apple AirPods Max (USB-C): The Definitive Flagship ANC Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive acoustic, DSP silicon, active noise cancellation, and spatial audio showdown comparing Sony, Bose, and Apple flagship wireless headphones.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design BreakdownHardware Analysis
12 min read

Apple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design Breakdown

An architectural deep dive into Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4: S11 SiP silicon, high-frequency optical PPG arrays, on-device Audio Intelligence, Longevity health age modeling, and the return of ceramic engineering.

Read Analysis →
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM ArchitectureHARDWARE DEEP DIVE
14 min read

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" Deep Dive: 16 Zen 5 Cores, 40-CU RDNA 3.5, 128GB Unified Memory, and Local LLM Architecture

A complete architectural breakdown of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Strix Halo): 16 full Zen 5 cores, Radeon 8060S with 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, 128GB unified LPDDR5X-8533 memory, 32MB MALL cache, and local AI benchmarks.

Read Analysis →