BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
vivo

vivo Pad

vivo Pad
95/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS vivo Pad BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo PadWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Fold

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo PadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,040 mAh4,380 mAh+8,040 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A7.3"7.3"
Chassis Weight489g276g276g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo Pad:
  • Larger 8,040 mAh battery capacity (+3,660 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 213g lighter chassis (276g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
Specificationvivo PadSamsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 12, OriginOS HDAndroid 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
ram gb812
camerasmain
displayIPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 (1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density))Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g489276
dimensions253.2 x 164.7 x 6.6 mm
os version129.0
battery mah80404380
connectivitynfc: Yes, usb: USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, bluetooth: 5.2, A2DP, LE
release date2022-04-112019-02-01
charging wired w44
storage options gb128, 256512
socSnapdragon 855
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

vivo Pad edges ahead with a BeastScore of 95.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, vivo Pad ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo Pad:
Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 84.0 · Larger battery capacity: 8,040 mAh (+3,660 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Significantly larger display: 7.3" vs max 0" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 276g (213g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo Pad vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: vivo Pad or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

vivo Pad leads with an overall BeastScore of 95.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Fold (84.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 95.0 vs top rival 84.0 and Larger battery capacity: 8,040 mAh (+3,660 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo Pad and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

vivo Pad is equipped with a display and 8040 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo Pad and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo Pad achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.