BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/vivo Pad SE vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

vivo Pad SE vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
vivo

vivo Pad SE

vivo Pad SE
94/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS vivo Pad SE BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

vivo Pad SEWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Fold

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORvivo PadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,500 mAh4,380 mAh+8,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A7.3"7.3"
Chassis Weight559g276g276g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo Pad SE:
  • Larger 8,500 mAh battery capacity (+4,120 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 283g lighter chassis (276g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
Specificationvivo Pad SESamsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 15, OriginOS 5 HDAndroid 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
ram gb812
camerasmain, selfiemain
displayIPS LCD, 90Hz, 600 nits (1600x2464 pixels)Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g559276
os version159.0
battery mah85004380
connectivitynfc: No, usb: USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, wifi: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, bluetooth: 4.2, A2DP
release date2025-04-252019-02-01
storage options gb6, 8, 128, 256512
socSnapdragon 855
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

vivo Pad SE edges ahead with a BeastScore of 94.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, vivo Pad SE ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose vivo Pad SE:
Higher overall BeastScore: 94.0 vs top rival 84.0 · Larger battery capacity: 8,500 mAh (+4,120 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Significantly larger display: 7.3" vs max 0" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 276g (283g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: vivo Pad SE vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: vivo Pad SE or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

vivo Pad SE leads with an overall BeastScore of 94.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Fold (84.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 94.0 vs top rival 84.0 and Larger battery capacity: 8,500 mAh (+4,120 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between vivo Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

vivo Pad SE is equipped with a display and 8500 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between vivo Pad SE and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, vivo Pad SE achieves a 94/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.