BeastCompare

vivo Y200 Pro vs Xiaomi 13: Which One Should You Buy?

Xiaomi 13 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.1/100 — but the right choice depends on what matters to you.

Head-to-head
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe ⇄
Vivo · 2024

vivo Y200 Pro

vivo Y200 Pro
83/ 100
Launch pricePrice on request
Xiaomi · 2023

Xiaomi 13

Xiaomi 13
83/ 100
Launch price$899
Head-to-head

Xiaomi 13 wins 4 of 7 categories

Here's exactly where each phone is stronger.

vivo Y200 Pro
vivo Y200 Pro
3 wins
Xiaomi 13
Xiaomi 13
4 wins
At a glance

Bigger shape = better phone.

SpeedCameraBatteryDisplayConnectivitySecurityValue
vivo Y200 ProXiaomi 13
Category winners

Scores out of 100. How we score

  • SpeedXiaomi 13
    79
    80
  • CameraXiaomi 13
    80
    91
  • VideoNot enough data
  • SelfieNot enough data
  • Batteryvivo Y200 Pro
    86
    80
  • Displayvivo Y200 Pro
    89
    88
  • ConnectivityXiaomi 13
    55
    65
  • SecurityXiaomi 13
    34
    100
  • Valuevivo Y200 Pro
    85
    68
Key differences
  • vivo Y200 Pro has the bigger battery5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • Xiaomi 13 charges faster67W vs 44W
  • vivo Y200 Pro has the bigger screen6.78" vs 6.36"
  • vivo Y200 Pro is lighter172 g vs 185 g
  • Xiaomi 13 has newer Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1
  • Xiaomi 13 is better protected from water and dustIP68 vs IP54
See all specs ↓

Why buy each phone

Swipe ⇄
Reasons to buy vivo Y200 Pro
  • ✓13 g lighter (172 g), easier to hold
  • ✓Bigger 5,000 mAh battery (+500 mAh)
  • ✓6.78" display at 120 Hz
Reasons to buy Xiaomi 13
  • ✓$9100 cheaper at launch ($899 vs $9999)
  • ✓50 MP main camera
  • ✓6.36" display at 120 Hz

Full specifications

Swipe ⇄
Specificationvivo Y200 ProXiaomi 13
1. Display & Screen🏆 vivo Y200 Pro Wins Display
Screen typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen Size6.78"6.36"
Resolution & DensityFHD+ / LTPO AMOLED (388 ppi)2400x1080 (413 ppi)
Refresh Rate120 Hz ProMotion120 Hz ProMotion
BrightnessN/A1,900 nits peak
Screen ProtectionNot listedNot listed
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Xiaomi 13 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorSnapdragon 695 5G Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm)
CPU CoresNot listedNot listed
GPU GraphicsNot listedAdreno 740
Operating SystemAndroid 14Android 13
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory8 GB LPDDR8 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage128 GB128GB / 256GB
Storage SpeedNot listedNot listed
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Xiaomi 13 Wins Camera
Primary Cameraundefined MP, Triple Camera System50 MP, f/1.8, OIS, Sony IMX800
Telephoto ZoomNone (digital zoom only)10 MP (3x optical zoom), f/3.5, OIS
Ultrawide CameraN/A12 MP, f/2.2
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video
Main Camera Video
Not listed
Not listed
Front Video
Not listed
Not listed
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lensundefined MP32 MP, f/2
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 vivo Y200 Pro Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/A152.8 x 71.5 x 7.98 mm
Weight172 g185 g
Build MaterialsNot listedNot listed
SIM TypeNot listedNot listed
Water ResistanceIP54IP68
8. Battery & Charging🏆 vivo Y200 Pro Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,000 mAh4,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingFast charging67W wired fast charging
Wireless ChargingNot listed50W wireless charging
Reverse ChargingNot listedNot listed
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerNot listedNot listed
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity
Wi-Fi StandardNot listedWi-Fi 6E
Bluetoothv5.15.3
USB Port & SpeedYesUSB-C 2.0
NFCYesYes (contactless payment)
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsNot listedNot listed
Satellite FeaturesNot listedNot listed
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsNot listedNot listed
Launch PricePrice on request$899
Our verdict

Xiaomi 13 wins — BeastScore 83.1/100

After comparing all the specs, Xiaomi 13 is the stronger all-round phone. Its main edge: Higher overall BeastScore: 83.1 vs top rival 82.8 and Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 44W.

Buy vivo Y200 Pro if you want

Larger battery capacity: 5,000 mAh (+500 mAh more) · Lighter body: 172g (13g lighter in hand)

Buy Xiaomi 13 if you want

Higher overall BeastScore: 83.1 vs top rival 82.8 · Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 44W

Common questions

Which is better: vivo Y200 Pro or Xiaomi 13?

Xiaomi 13 leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.1/100 compared to vivo Y200 Pro (82.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 83.1 vs top rival 82.8 and Significantly faster wired charging: 67W vs max 44W.

What are the main battery and display differences between vivo Y200 Pro and Xiaomi 13?

vivo Y200 Pro has a 6.78-inch display and 5000 mAh battery. Xiaomi 13 has a 6.36-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.

How do vivo Y200 Pro and Xiaomi 13 compare for speed?

vivo Y200 Pro scores 79/100 for performance; Xiaomi 13 scores 80/100.

Similar Smartphones

Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung

Galaxy A37 5G

Apple iPad mini (2024)
Apple

Apple iPad mini (2024)

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Google

Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold

OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite (India)

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

vivo Y300 Plus
Vivo

vivo Y300 Plus

A5 Pro
Oppo

A5 Pro

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

More Smartphones comparisons

vs

vivo Y200 Pro vs vivo Y400 Pro 5G

Compare →
vs

vivo Y200 Pro vs vivo Y500 Pro 5G (China)

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi 13 vs Xiaomi 14

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi 13 vs Xiaomi 15

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi 12 vs Xiaomi 13

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi 13 Pro vs Xiaomi 13

Compare →
vs

Xiaomi 13 vs Xiaomi 13T Pro

Compare →
vs

vivo Y200 Pro vs Galaxy A37 5G

Compare →

Related articles

All articles →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read →
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)Definitive Foldable Guide 2026
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 vs. Motorola Razr+ (2024) vs. Xiaomi Mix Flip: The Definitive Flagship Clamshell Foldable Architecture, Outer Screen Workflows, Armor Aluminum & Titanium Hinges, Silicon-Carbon Batteries, and Dual 50MP Camera Showdown (2026)

A rigorous 2026 engineering and lab benchmark comparison of the top three clamshell foldables: evaluating Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy vs. 8s Gen 3, teardrop dual-rail hinge mechanics, 1.5K quad-curved vs. 165Hz cover displays, 4,780mAh silicon-carbon battery chemistry, and Leica vs. ProVisual computational photography.

Read →
Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)Audiophile Flagship Reference
15 min read

Sennheiser HD 800 S vs. HiFiMAN Arya Organic vs. Audeze LCD-X vs. Meze 109 Pro: The Definitive Flagship Audiophile Open-Back Headphone Architecture, 56mm Ring Radiators vs. Nanometer Stealth Planar vs. Fazor Magnetic Flux vs. Beryllium Dynamic Transducers, Soundstage Imaging, DAC/Amp Driveability, and Critical Listening Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 2026 engineering and acoustic analysis comparing the four defining flagships in open-back high-fidelity audio: Sennheiser HD 800 S, HiFiMAN Arya Organic, Audeze LCD-X, and Meze 109 Pro across transducer physics, acoustic cavity dispersion, voltage vs. current driveability, and harmonic distortion.

Read →