BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3
77/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi Pad 3?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3
Samsung Galaxy FoldWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORXiaomi MiSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity6,600 mAh4,380 mAh+6,600 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7.9"7.3"7.9"
Chassis Weight328g276g276g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Mi Pad 3:
  • Larger 6,600 mAh battery capacity (+2,220 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.9" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 52g lighter chassis (276g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationXiaomi Mi Pad 3Samsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid OSAndroid 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
socMediatek MT8176Snapdragon 855
ram gb412
camerasmainmain
displayIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen 16M colors 7.9" (1536 x 2048 pixels (~326 ppi pixel density)) 324 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g328276
battery mah66004380
connectivitygps: Yes, sim: No, usb: Type-C 1.0 reversible connector, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac| dual-band| Wi-Fi Direct| hotspot, network: No cellular connectivity, bluetooth: 4.1| A2DP| LE
release date2017-04-012019-02-01
storage options gb64512
os version9.0
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Xiaomi Mi Pad 3:
Larger battery capacity: 6,600 mAh (+2,220 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 7.9" vs max 7.3" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 77.0 · Lighter body: 276g (52g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 (77.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 77.0 and Lighter body: 276g (52g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 is equipped with a 7.9-inch display and 6600 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.