BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Sony · 2014

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact
65/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2025

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) BETTER THAN Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORXperia Z3Samsung SM-G766NLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity4,500 mAh4,350 mAh+4,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor8.1 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size8"6.58"8"
Chassis Weight270g240g240g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact:
  • ✓Larger 4,500 mAh battery capacity (+150 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓8.1MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766):
  • ✓30g lighter chassis (240g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓6.58" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationXperia Z3 Tablet CompactSamsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact Wins Display
Screen Type & TechTFT LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsColor PLS TFT LCD display
Screen Size8"6.58"
Resolution & Density1200x1920 (283 ppi)1080x2408 (401 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory3 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage3GB / 16GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact Wins Camera
Primary Camera8.1 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens2.2 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight270 g240 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,500 mAh4,350 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspotWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, LE, aptXBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0 (MHL 3 TV-out), USB Host; magnetic connectorUSB Type-C
NFCYes (contactless payment)Yes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.2/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact:
Significantly larger display: 8" vs max 6.58" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766):
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 64.8 · More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 3GB
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Which is better: Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact or Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.2/100 compared to Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact (64.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 64.8 and More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 3GB.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact is equipped with a 8-inch display and 4500 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) features a 6.58-inch display and 4350 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact and Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) scores 72/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Samsung

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A17k
Oppo

A17k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Sony WH-1000XM6 & XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Apple AirPods Max (USB-C): The Definitive Flagship ANC Showdown (2026)Ultimate Audio Shootout
16 min read

Sony WH-1000XM6 & XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Apple AirPods Max (USB-C): The Definitive Flagship ANC Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive acoustic, DSP silicon, active noise cancellation, and spatial audio showdown comparing Sony, Bose, and Apple flagship wireless headphones.

Read Analysis →
Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)Definitive Audio Guide 2026
16 min read

Apple AirPods Pro 2 vs. Sony WF-1000XM5 vs. Bose QuietComfort Ultra vs. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 4: The Definitive Flagship ANC Earbuds Architecture, Custom Acoustic Drivers, Adaptive DSP, FDA Clinical Hearing Aid Validation, Lossless Codecs, and Noise Cancellation Showdown (2026)

We stress-test the four titans of true wireless audio across low-frequency subway rumble, vocal babble attenuation, clinical hearing aid acoustic profiling, LDAC vs. aptX Lossless throughput, and real-world battery endurance.

Read Analysis →
Apple iPad Pro M4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 11: The Definitive Flagship OLED Tablet & 2-in-1 Architecture, Tandem OLED, NPU Silicon, Stylus Latency, and Desktop OS Convergence Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
16 min read

Apple iPad Pro M4 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs. Microsoft Surface Pro 11: The Definitive Flagship OLED Tablet & 2-in-1 Architecture, Tandem OLED, NPU Silicon, Stylus Latency, and Desktop OS Convergence Showdown (2026)

We test Apple's 3nm Tandem OLED powerhouse, Samsung's 14.6-inch Dimensity 9300+ anti-reflective slate, and Microsoft's Snapdragon X Elite Copilot+ PC across Geekbench 6, Cinebench 2024, stylus latency, thermal throttling, battery life, and real-world desktop multitasking.

Read Analysis →