BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Zenwatch WI500Q vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Lab Benchmark Battle

Zenwatch WI500Q vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Zenwatch WI500Q

Zenwatch WI500Q
82/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Allview

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
70/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Zenwatch WI500Q BETTER THAN Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Zenwatch WI500QWinner 🏆
Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORZenwatch WI500QAllview AllwatchLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh200 mAh+1,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size1.63"1.22"1.63"
Chassis Weight75g88g75g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Zenwatch WI500Q:
  • 13g lighter chassis (75g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 1,500 mAh battery capacity (+1,300 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.63" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Allview Allwatch Hybrid S:
  • 1.22" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationZenwatch WI500QAllview Allwatch Hybrid S
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osAndroidProprietary OS
socQualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400Allview mobile platform 2018
ram gb11
camerasNone
displayAMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors 1.63" (320x320) 278 PPILCD 1.22" (240x240 pixels) 278 PPI
weight g7588
battery mah1500200
connectivitybluetooth: 4.0, A2DP
release date2014-01-012018-12-01
storage options gb4
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Zenwatch WI500Q edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Zenwatch WI500Q ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Zenwatch WI500Q:
Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 70.0 · Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,300 mAh more)
When to choose Allview Allwatch Hybrid S:
Balanced specifications with Allview hardware design · Runs Proprietary OS with optimized security support
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Zenwatch WI500Q vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S

Which is better: Zenwatch WI500Q or Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

Zenwatch WI500Q leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.0/100 compared to Allview Allwatch Hybrid S (70.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 70.0 and Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,300 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Zenwatch WI500Q and Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

Zenwatch WI500Q is equipped with a 1.63-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Allview Allwatch Hybrid S features a 1.22-inch display and 200 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Zenwatch WI500Q and Allview Allwatch Hybrid S?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Zenwatch WI500Q achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Allview Allwatch Hybrid S scores 88/100.