BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/ZTE PF 100 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

ZTE PF 100 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ZTE

ZTE PF 100

ZTE PF 100
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN ZTE PF 100?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

ZTE PF 100
Samsung Galaxy FoldWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORZTE PFSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh4,380 mAh+4,380 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.1"7.3"10.1"
Chassis Weight150g276g150g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy ZTE PF 100:
  • 126g lighter chassis (150g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • Larger 4,380 mAh battery capacity (+2,880 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationZTE PF 100Samsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.0Android 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
socNvidia Tegra 3Snapdragon 855
ram gb112
camerasmain, selfiemain
displayTFT 10.1" (768x1280 pixels) 148 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g150276
os version4.09.0
battery mah15004380
release date2012-02-012019-02-01
storage options gb16512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose ZTE PF 100:
Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 7.3" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 150g (126g lighter in hand)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 71.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,380 mAh (+2,880 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: ZTE PF 100 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: ZTE PF 100 or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to ZTE PF 100 (71.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,380 mAh (+2,880 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between ZTE PF 100 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

ZTE PF 100 is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between ZTE PF 100 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, ZTE PF 100 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.