BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Acer Iconia Tab A511 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Lab Benchmark Battle

Acer Iconia Tab A511 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Acer

Acer Iconia Tab A511

Acer Iconia Tab A511
83/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
83/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,849.99 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Acer Iconia Tab A511 BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Acer Iconia Tab A511Winner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAcer IconiaSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity9,800 mAh4,400 mAh+9,800 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size10.1"7.6"10.1"
Chassis Weight777g253g253g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Acer Iconia Tab A511:
  • Larger 9,800 mAh battery capacity (+5,400 mAh more capacity)
  • 10.1" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
  • 524g lighter chassis (253g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • $8149.01 lower launch MSRP ($1849.99 vs $9999)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAcer Iconia Tab A511Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.0Android 13, up to 4 major upgrades
socNvidia Tegra 3Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
ram gb112
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayTFT, 256K colors 10.1" (1280x800 pixels) 149 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ 7.6" (1812x2176 pixels) 373 PPI
weight g777253
os version4.013
battery mah98004400
release date2012-02-012023-07-01
storage options gb16, 32256, 512, 1024
Launch MSRPPrice on request$1849.99 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Acer Iconia Tab A511 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Acer Iconia Tab A511 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Acer Iconia Tab A511:
Larger battery capacity: 9,800 mAh (+5,400 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 7.6" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
Lighter body: 253g (524g lighter in hand) · Lower launch price: $1849.99 (save $Infinity)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Acer Iconia Tab A511 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Which is better: Acer Iconia Tab A511 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Acer Iconia Tab A511 leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (83.0/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 9,800 mAh (+5,400 mAh more) and Significantly larger display: 10.1" vs max 7.6" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Acer Iconia Tab A511 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Acer Iconia Tab A511 is equipped with a 10.1-inch display and 9800 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Acer Iconia Tab A511 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Acer Iconia Tab A511 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read Analysis →