BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Allview Viva C701 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

Allview Viva C701 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Allview

Allview Viva C701

Allview Viva C701
74/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN Allview Viva C701?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Allview Viva C701
Samsung Galaxy FoldWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAllview VivaSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity2,700 mAh4,380 mAh+4,380 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.3"7.3"
Chassis Weight296g276g276g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Allview Viva C701:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 20g lighter chassis (276g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,380 mAh battery capacity (+1,680 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAllview Viva C701Samsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 5.1 (Lollipop)Android 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
ram gb112
camerasmainmain
displayCapacitive touchscreen 7" (600 x 1024 pixels (~170 ppi pixel density)) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g296276
os version5.19.0
battery mah27004380
connectivitysim: No, usb: microUSB 2.0, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, network: No cellular connectivity, bluetooth: No
release date2015-09-012019-02-01
storage options gb8512
socSnapdragon 855
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Allview Viva C701:
Balanced specifications with Allview hardware design · Runs Android 5.1 (Lollipop) with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 74.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,380 mAh (+1,680 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Allview Viva C701 vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: Allview Viva C701 or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Allview Viva C701 (74.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 74.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,380 mAh (+1,680 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Allview Viva C701 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Allview Viva C701 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 2700 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Allview Viva C701 and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Allview Viva C701 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read Analysis →