BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Allview Viva i10G vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

Allview Viva i10G vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Allview

Allview Viva i10G

Allview Viva i10G
83/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN Allview Viva i10G?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Allview Viva i10G
Samsung Galaxy FoldWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAllview VivaSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,000 mAh4,380 mAh+8,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A7.3"7.3"
Chassis Weight5887g276g276g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Allview Viva i10G:
  • Larger 8,000 mAh battery capacity (+3,620 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 5611g lighter chassis (276g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAllview Viva i10GSamsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.4Android 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
ram gb212
camerasmain, selfiemain
displayIPS LCD (1536x2048 pixels)Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g588.7276
os version4.49.0
battery mah80004380
connectivitynfc: No, usb: microUSB 2.0, OTG, wifi: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, bluetooth: 3.0
release date2014-06-012019-02-01
storage options gb2, 16512
socSnapdragon 855
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Allview Viva i10G:
Larger battery capacity: 8,000 mAh (+3,620 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.0 · Significantly larger display: 7.3" vs max 0" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Allview Viva i10G vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: Allview Viva i10G or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Allview Viva i10G (83.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 83.0 and Significantly larger display: 7.3" vs max 0" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Allview Viva i10G and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Allview Viva i10G is equipped with a display and 8000 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Allview Viva i10G and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Allview Viva i10G achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read Analysis →