BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Allview Viva i10G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Lab Benchmark Battle

Allview Viva i10G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Allview

Allview Viva i10G

Allview Viva i10G
83/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
83/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,849.99 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Allview Viva i10G BETTER THAN Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Allview Viva i10GWinner 🏆
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAllview VivaSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity8,000 mAh4,400 mAh+8,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight5887g253g253g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Allview Viva i10G:
  • Larger 8,000 mAh battery capacity (+3,600 mAh more capacity)
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
  • 5634g lighter chassis (253g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • $8149.01 lower launch MSRP ($1849.99 vs $9999)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAllview Viva i10GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold5
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.4Android 13, up to 4 major upgrades
ram gb212
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD (1536x2048 pixels)Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ 7.6" (1812x2176 pixels) 373 PPI
weight g588.7253
os version4.413
battery mah80004400
connectivitynfc: No, usb: microUSB 2.0, OTG, wifi: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, bluetooth: 3.0
release date2014-06-012023-07-01
storage options gb2, 16256, 512, 1024
socSnapdragon 8 Gen 2
Launch MSRPPrice on request$1849.99 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Allview Viva i10G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Allview Viva i10G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Allview Viva i10G:
Larger battery capacity: 8,000 mAh (+3,600 mAh more)
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
Significantly larger display: 7.6" vs max 0" for media & multitasking · Lighter body: 253g (5634g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Allview Viva i10G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Which is better: Allview Viva i10G or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Allview Viva i10G leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.0/100 compared to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (83.0/100), driven by advantages in Larger battery capacity: 8,000 mAh (+3,600 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Allview Viva i10G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Allview Viva i10G is equipped with a display and 8000 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Allview Viva i10G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Allview Viva i10G achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)Flagship Camera Shootout
14 min read

iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Definitive Flagship Camera Sensor Architecture, 5x Periscope Optics, 4K120 ProRes Log, 8K Video, Computational ISP, and Low-Light Shootout (2026)

An architectural teardown and real-world imaging shootout across Apple's 48MP Fusion quad-pixel sensor with 4K120 ProRes LOG, Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP2 Quad-Tele system with ProVisual AI Engine, and Google's 50MP GNK sensor paired with Tensor G4 HDRnet and Night Sight Video.

Read Analysis →