BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Amazon Kindle Fire vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

Amazon Kindle Fire vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Amazon

Amazon Kindle Fire

Amazon Kindle Fire
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN Amazon Kindle Fire?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Amazon Kindle Fire
Samsung Galaxy FoldWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAmazon KindleSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity4,400 mAh4,380 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.3"7.3"
Chassis Weight413g276g276g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Amazon Kindle Fire:
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+20 mAh more capacity)
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 137g lighter chassis (276g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAmazon Kindle FireSamsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 2.3 (customized)Android 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
socTI OMAP 4430Snapdragon 855
ram gb112
camerasmain
displayIPS LCD capacitive touchscreen 16M colors 7" (600 x 1024 pixels (~170 ppi pixel density)) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g413276
os version2.39.0
battery mah44004380
connectivitygps: No, sim: No, usb: Yes, wlan: Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, network: No cellular connectivity, bluetooth: No
release date2011-09-012019-02-01
storage options gb8512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Amazon Kindle Fire:
Balanced specifications with Amazon hardware design · Runs Android 2.3 (customized) with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0 · Lighter body: 276g (137g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Amazon Kindle Fire vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: Amazon Kindle Fire or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Amazon Kindle Fire (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Lighter body: 276g (137g lighter in hand).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Amazon Kindle Fire and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Amazon Kindle Fire is equipped with a 7-inch display and 4400 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Amazon Kindle Fire and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Amazon Kindle Fire achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.