BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus Fonepad 7 (2014)

Asus Fonepad 7 (2014)
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
83/ 100
Launch MSRP$1,849.99 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 BETTER THAN Asus Fonepad 7 (2014)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus Fonepad 7 (2014)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus FonepadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,910 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight290g253g253g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus Fonepad 7 (2014):
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
  • 37g lighter chassis (253g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • $8149.01 lower launch MSRP ($1849.99 vs $9999)
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+490 mAh more capacity)

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus Fonepad 7 (2014)Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.3Android 13, up to 4 major upgrades
socIntel Atom Z2520Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
ram gb112
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD 7" (600x1024 pixels) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ 7.6" (1812x2176 pixels) 373 PPI
weight g290253
os version4.313
battery mah39104400
release date2014-05-012023-07-01
storage options gb4, 8256, 512, 1024
Launch MSRPPrice on request$1849.99 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 83.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus Fonepad 7 (2014):
Balanced specifications with ASUS hardware design · Runs Android 4.3 with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5:
Higher overall BeastScore: 83.0 vs top rival 73.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+490 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Which is better: Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 leads with an overall BeastScore of 83.0/100 compared to Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 83.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+490 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3910 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus Fonepad 7 (2014) achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M4 Max) vs. ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Lenovo Legion Pro 7i: The Definitive Flagship Pro Laptop Architecture, 3nm Silicon, 546 GB/s Unified Memory, Laptop GPUs, Local AI LLM Inference, and Battery Efficiency Showdown (2026)Flagship Laptop Architecture Shootout
16 min read

Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M4 Max) vs. ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Lenovo Legion Pro 7i: The Definitive Flagship Pro Laptop Architecture, 3nm Silicon, 546 GB/s Unified Memory, Laptop GPUs, Local AI LLM Inference, and Battery Efficiency Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural teardown, thermal analysis, and real-world benchmark shootout across Apple's 3nm M4 Max with 546 GB/s unified memory, ASUS's CNC-milled Zephyrus G16 pairing Zen 5 Ryzen AI 9 / Core Ultra 9 with RTX 4090 OLED, and Lenovo's 175W Legion Pro 7i raw compute workstation.

Read Analysis →
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)2026 Foldable Benchmarks
14 min read

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)

A comprehensive 2026 technical breakdown comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, OnePlus Open, and Honor Magic V3 across aerospace hinge mechanisms, UTG crease dispersion, Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 silicon, Open Canvas vs. One UI 6.1.1 multitasking, Hasselblad & periscope optical sensors, and third-gen silicon-carbon battery endurance.

Read Analysis →