BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG vs Samsung Galaxy Fold
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Fold

Samsung Galaxy Fold
84/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Fold BETTER THAN Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG
Samsung Galaxy FoldWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus FonepadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,950 mAh4,380 mAh+4,380 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.3"7.3"
Chassis Weight280g276g276g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Fold:
  • 4g lighter chassis (276g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,380 mAh battery capacity (+430 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus Fonepad 7 FE171CGSamsung Galaxy Fold
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.4Android 9.0, up to Android 12, One UI 4
socIntel Atom Z2520Snapdragon 855
ram gb212
camerasmain, selfiemain
displayIPS LCD 7" (600x1024 pixels) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ 7.3" (1536x2152 pixels) 362 PPI
weight g280276
os version4.49.0
battery mah39504380
release date2015-01-012019-02-01
storage options gb8, 16512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Fold edges ahead with a BeastScore of 84.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Fold ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG:
Balanced specifications with ASUS hardware design · Runs Android 4.4 with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Fold:
Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,380 mAh (+430 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

Which is better: Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG or Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Samsung Galaxy Fold leads with an overall BeastScore of 84.0/100 compared to Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 84.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,380 mAh (+430 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3950 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Fold features a 7.3-inch display and 4380 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG and Samsung Galaxy Fold?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus Fonepad 7 FE171CG achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Fold scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M4 Max) vs. ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Lenovo Legion Pro 7i: The Definitive Flagship Pro Laptop Architecture, 3nm Silicon, 546 GB/s Unified Memory, Laptop GPUs, Local AI LLM Inference, and Battery Efficiency Showdown (2026)Flagship Laptop Architecture Shootout
16 min read

Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M4 Max) vs. ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Lenovo Legion Pro 7i: The Definitive Flagship Pro Laptop Architecture, 3nm Silicon, 546 GB/s Unified Memory, Laptop GPUs, Local AI LLM Inference, and Battery Efficiency Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural teardown, thermal analysis, and real-world benchmark shootout across Apple's 3nm M4 Max with 546 GB/s unified memory, ASUS's CNC-milled Zephyrus G16 pairing Zen 5 Ryzen AI 9 / Core Ultra 9 with RTX 4090 OLED, and Lenovo's 175W Legion Pro 7i raw compute workstation.

Read Analysis →
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)2026 Foldable Benchmarks
14 min read

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)

A comprehensive 2026 technical breakdown comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, OnePlus Open, and Honor Magic V3 across aerospace hinge mechanisms, UTG crease dispersion, Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 silicon, Open Canvas vs. One UI 6.1.1 multitasking, Hasselblad & periscope optical sensors, and third-gen silicon-carbon battery endurance.

Read Analysis →