BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus Fonepad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus Fonepad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus Fonepad

Asus Fonepad
73/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Asus Fonepad?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus Fonepad
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus FonepadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity4,270 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight340g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus Fonepad:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 69g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+130 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus FonepadSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.1Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socIntel Atom Z2420Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb112
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD 7" (800x1280 pixels) 216 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g340271
os version4.111
battery mah42704400
release date2013-02-012021-08-01
storage options gb8, 16, 32256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus Fonepad:
Balanced specifications with ASUS hardware design · Runs Android 4.1 with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0 · Significantly larger display: 7.6" vs max 7" for media & multitasking
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus Fonepad vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Asus Fonepad or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Asus Fonepad (73.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 73.0 and Significantly larger display: 7.6" vs max 7" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus Fonepad and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Asus Fonepad is equipped with a 7-inch display and 4270 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus Fonepad and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus Fonepad achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →