BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus PadFone vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus PadFone vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus PadFone

Asus PadFone
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Google · 2023

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
72/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) BETTER THAN Asus PadFone?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus PadFone
Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus PadFoneGoogle PixelLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,520 mAh4,821 mAh+4,821 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size4.3"7.57"7.57"
Chassis Weight129g283g129g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus PadFone:
  • 154g lighter chassis (129g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • 4.3" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix):
  • Larger 4,821 mAh battery capacity (+3,301 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.57" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus PadFoneGoogle Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.0, up to 4.1
socQualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb1
camerasmain, selfie
displaySuper AMOLED 4.3" (540x960 pixels) 256 PPI
weight g129
os version4.0
battery mah1520
release date2012-02-01
storage options gb16, 32, 64
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 72.3/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus PadFone:
Lighter body: 129g (154g lighter in hand)
When to choose Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix):
Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+3,301 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus PadFone vs Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)

Which is better: Asus PadFone or Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)?

Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) leads with an overall BeastScore of 72.3/100 compared to Asus PadFone (71.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 72.3 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,821 mAh (+3,301 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus PadFone and Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)?

Asus PadFone is equipped with a 4.3-inch display and 1520 mAh battery, while Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) features a 7.57-inch display and 4821 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus PadFone and Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus PadFone achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Google Pixel Fold 5G UW TD-LTE JP 256GB G0B96 (Google Felix) scores 90/100.