BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS vs Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS vs Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Gaming Laptops Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS

Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS
86/ 100
Launch MSRP$373 USD
Apple

Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)

Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)
93/ 100
Launch MSRP$2,205 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac) BETTER THAN Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS
Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus VivobookApple MacBookLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery CapacityN/AN/A0 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size14"14"14"
Chassis WeightN/AN/A999g

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS:
  • $1832 lower launch MSRP ($373 vs $2205)
  • 14" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac):
  • 14" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WSApple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Gaming Laptops)
osWindowsMac
cpuAMD Ryzen 3 7320U
ram gb816
display14" (1920x1080) 157 PPI14" (3024x1964) 258 PPI
cpu nameAMD Ryzen 3 7320UApple M4 M4
gpu nameAMD Radeon RadeonApple Apple GPU Apple 10-Core GPU
gpu typeIntegratedIntegrated
storage gb5121024
release date2023-01-012024-01-01
device categoryThin & LightGeneral
Launch MSRP$373 USD$2205 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 93.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS:
Lower launch price: $373 (save $1832)
When to choose Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac):
Higher overall BeastScore: 93.0 vs top rival 86.0
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS vs Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)

Which is better: Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS or Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)?

Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac) leads with an overall BeastScore of 93.0/100 compared to Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS (86.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 93.0 vs top rival 86.0.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS and Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)?

Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS is equipped with a 14-inch display and standard battery, while Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac) features a 14-inch display and standard battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS and Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus Vivobook Go 14 E1404FA-EB2322WS achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M4 / 16GB / 1024GB / Apple 10-Core GPU / Mac) scores 94/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)Copilot+ PC Silicon Deep Dive
19 min read

Intel Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 200V) vs. AMD Strix Point (Ryzen AI 300) vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: The Definitive Copilot+ PC Silicon Architecture, Battery Life, NPU, and x86 vs. ARM Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive 3-way architectural breakdown pitting Intel's Memory-on-Package Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V / 288V), AMD's Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 Strix Point (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370), and Qualcomm's ARM Oryon Snapdragon X Elite against each other across IPC, multi-threaded efficiency, gaming FPS, local NPU TOPS, and real-world 20+ hour battery life.

Read Analysis →