BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
ASUS

Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG

Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG
71/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORAsus ZenpadSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,500 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight275g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 4g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+900 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationAsus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MGSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 5.0Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socMediatek MT8382Qualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb112
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayIPS LCD 7" (600x1024 pixels) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g275271
os version5.011
battery mah35004400
release date2015-06-012021-08-01
storage options gb8, 16256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG:
Balanced specifications with ASUS hardware design · Runs Android 5.0 with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 71.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+900 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG (71.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 71.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+900 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3500 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Asus Zenpad C 7.0 Z170MG achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.

Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)Hardware Deep Dive
18 min read

ASUS ROG Ally X vs. Steam Deck OLED vs. Lenovo Legion Go: The Definitive PC Gaming Handheld Architecture, Battery Life, RDNA 3, and OS Performance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural deep dive comparing the ASUS ROG Ally X, Valve Steam Deck OLED, and Lenovo Legion Go across AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs. custom Sephiroth APUs, 80Wh vs 50Wh vs 49.2Wh battery thermals, RDNA 3 compute, SteamOS vs Windows 11 optimization, and real-world frametimes.

Read Analysis →
Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M4 Max) vs. ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Lenovo Legion Pro 7i: The Definitive Flagship Pro Laptop Architecture, 3nm Silicon, 546 GB/s Unified Memory, Laptop GPUs, Local AI LLM Inference, and Battery Efficiency Showdown (2026)Flagship Laptop Architecture Shootout
16 min read

Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M4 Max) vs. ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Lenovo Legion Pro 7i: The Definitive Flagship Pro Laptop Architecture, 3nm Silicon, 546 GB/s Unified Memory, Laptop GPUs, Local AI LLM Inference, and Battery Efficiency Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive architectural teardown, thermal analysis, and real-world benchmark shootout across Apple's 3nm M4 Max with 546 GB/s unified memory, ASUS's CNC-milled Zephyrus G16 pairing Zen 5 Ryzen AI 9 / Core Ultra 9 with RTX 4090 OLED, and Lenovo's 175W Legion Pro 7i raw compute workstation.

Read Analysis →
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)2026 Foldable Benchmarks
14 min read

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. OnePlus Open vs. Honor Magic V3: The Definitive Flagship Book-Style Foldable Architecture, Dual-Screen Ergonomics, Hinge Engineering, Multitasking OS, Periscope Cameras, and Battery Durability Showdown (2026)

A comprehensive 2026 technical breakdown comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, OnePlus Open, and Honor Magic V3 across aerospace hinge mechanisms, UTG crease dispersion, Tensor G4 vs. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 silicon, Open Canvas vs. One UI 6.1.1 multitasking, Hasselblad & periscope optical sensors, and third-gen silicon-carbon battery endurance.

Read Analysis →