BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/BLU Studio 7.0 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Lab Benchmark Battle

BLU Studio 7.0 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
BLU Products

BLU Studio 7.0

BLU Studio 7.0
74/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
86/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G BETTER THAN BLU Studio 7.0?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

BLU Studio 7.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORBLU StudioSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity3,000 mAh4,400 mAh+4,400 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size7"7.6"7.6"
Chassis Weight299g271g271g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy BLU Studio 7.0:
  • 7" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
  • 28g lighter chassis (271g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • Larger 4,400 mAh battery capacity (+1,400 mAh more capacity)
  • 7.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationBLU Studio 7.0Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 4.4.2Android 11, up to 4 major upgrades
socDual-core 1.3 GHzQualcomm Snapdragon
ram gb112
camerasmain, selfiemain, selfie
displayTFT 7" (600x1024 pixels) 170 PPIFoldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) 7.6" (1768x2208 pixels) 372 PPI
weight g299271
os version4.4.211
battery mah30004400
release date2014-11-012021-08-01
storage options gb8256, 512
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G edges ahead with a BeastScore of 86.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose BLU Studio 7.0:
Balanced specifications with BLU Products hardware design · Runs Android 4.4.2 with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:
Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 74.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+1,400 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: BLU Studio 7.0 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

Which is better: BLU Studio 7.0 or Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G leads with an overall BeastScore of 86.0/100 compared to BLU Studio 7.0 (74.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 86.0 vs top rival 74.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,400 mAh (+1,400 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between BLU Studio 7.0 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

BLU Studio 7.0 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 3000 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G features a 7.6-inch display and 4400 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between BLU Studio 7.0 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G?

In objective hardware benchmarks, BLU Studio 7.0 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G scores 88/100.