BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Coolpad Cool1 dual vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
Lab Benchmark Battle

Coolpad Cool1 dual vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Tablets & iPads Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Coolpad

Coolpad Cool1 dual

Coolpad Cool1 dual
79/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2020

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
79/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q BETTER THAN Coolpad Cool1 dual?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Coolpad Cool1 dual
SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916QWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORCoolpad Cool1SM-F916J GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz120Hz120Hz
Battery Capacity4,060 mAh4,500 mAh+4,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandard25W25W
Main Camera SensorN/A12.2 MP48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A6.22"6.22"
Chassis Weight167g282g167g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Coolpad Cool1 dual:
  • 115g lighter chassis (167g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
Reasons to buy SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q:
  • Larger 4,500 mAh battery capacity (+440 mAh more capacity)
  • 12.2MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • 6.22" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationCoolpad Cool1 dualSM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Tablets & iPads)
osAndroid 6.0 (Marshmallow), eUI 5.6
socQualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
ram gb4
camerasmain, selfie
display(1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density))
weight g167
os version6.0
battery mah4060
release date2016-01-01
storage options gb32, 64
Launch MSRPPrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q edges ahead with a BeastScore of 79.1/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Coolpad Cool1 dual:
Lighter body: 167g (115g lighter in hand)
When to choose SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q:
Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 79.0 · Larger battery capacity: 4,500 mAh (+440 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Coolpad Cool1 dual vs SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q

Which is better: Coolpad Cool1 dual or SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?

SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q leads with an overall BeastScore of 79.1/100 compared to Coolpad Cool1 dual (79.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 79.1 vs top rival 79.0 and Larger battery capacity: 4,500 mAh (+440 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Coolpad Cool1 dual and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?

Coolpad Cool1 dual is equipped with a display and 4060 mAh battery, while SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q features a 6.22-inch display and 4500 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Coolpad Cool1 dual and SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Coolpad Cool1 dual achieves a 88/100 performance score, while SM-F916J Galaxy Z Fold2 UW 5G TD-LTE JP 256GB SCG05 / SM-F916Q scores 90/100.