BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/G Watch W100 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Lab Benchmark Battle

G Watch W100 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
LG Electronics

G Watch W100

G Watch W100
82/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
92/ 100
Launch MSRP$649 USD
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) BETTER THAN G Watch W100?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

G Watch W100
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORG WatchSamsung GalaxyLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery CapacityN/A590 mAh+590 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display SizeN/A1.5"6.1"
Chassis WeightN/AN/A999g

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy G Watch W100:

Comprehensive flagship hardware with verified benchmark scores.

Reasons to buy Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
  • $9350 lower launch MSRP ($649 vs $9999)
  • Larger 590 mAh battery capacity (+590 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationG Watch W100Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osAndroid
soc[object Object]
nameG Watch W100
slugg-watch-w100
brand[object Object]
images
ram gb1
cameras
display[object Object]1.5-inch Super AMOLED (480x480, Sapphire Crystal), up to 3000 nits peak outdoor brightness
verified
weight g63
dimensions[object Object]
battery mah1500
connectivity[object Object]
release date2014-01-01
base model slugg-watch-w100
storage options gb4
gpsDual-frequency GPS (L1 + L5) for pinpoint trail and marathon tracking
battery590 mAh (up to 100 hours in Power Saving mode, 48 hours Exercise mode)
materialsAerospace-grade Grade 4 Titanium cushion frame
processor3nm Exynos W1000 (Penta-core)
durability10 ATM + IP68 water resistance + MIL-STD-810H, built-in 86dB emergency siren
Launch MSRPPrice on request$649 USD
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose G Watch W100:
Balanced specifications with LG Electronics hardware design · Runs Android with optimized security support
When to choose Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm):
Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 82.0 · Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+590 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: G Watch W100 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)

Which is better: G Watch W100 or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to G Watch W100 (82.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 82.0 and Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+590 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between G Watch W100 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

G Watch W100 is equipped with a display and standard battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between G Watch W100 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, G Watch W100 achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) scores 94/100.