Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 BETTER THAN Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Galaxy Tab | Xiaomi Redmi | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh | +5,100 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 3.15 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7.7" | 6.71" | 7.7" |
| Chassis Weight | 340.2g | 199g | 199g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Which is better: Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 or Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?
Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) (66.4/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 7.7" vs max 6.71" for media & multitasking.
What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 and Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?
Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 is equipped with a 7.7-inch display and 5100 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) features a 6.71-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 and Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 23028RNCAI (Xiaomi Water)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A17k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Galaxy Tab 7.7 LTE I815 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
UpdateXiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4
Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
