BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2019

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019)

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Xiaomi · 2024

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) BETTER THAN Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019)Winner 🏆
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORGalaxy TabXiaomi RedmiLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity5,100 mAh5,000 mAh+5,100 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor8 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size8"6.71"8"
Chassis Weight345g199g199g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019):
  • ✓Larger 5,100 mAh battery capacity (+100 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓8" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein):
  • ✓146g lighter chassis (199g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓6.71" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019)Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) Wins Display
Screen Type & TechTFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsColor IPS TFT LCD display
Screen Size8"6.71"
Resolution & Density800x1280 (189 ppi)720x1650 (268 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory2 GB LPDDR3 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage2GB / 32GB64GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) Wins Camera
Primary Camera8 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens2 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight345 g199 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) Wins Battery
Battery Capacity5,100 mAh5,000 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LEBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019):
Significantly larger display: 8" vs max 6.71" for media & multitasking
When to choose Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein):
Lighter body: 199g (146g lighter in hand)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

Which is better: Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) or Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) (66.4/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 8" vs max 6.71" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) and Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) is equipped with a 8-inch display and 5100 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) features a 6.71-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) and Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Samsung

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 23028RNCAI (Xiaomi Water)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A2+ 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE IN 32GB 23028RNCAI (Xiaomi Water)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A17k
Oppo

A17k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab A 8.0 (2019) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read Analysis →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →