Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Galaxy Tab CDMA P100
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
WHY IS Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Galaxy Tab | Xiaomi Mi4 | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,080 mAh | +4,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 3.15 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 7" | 5" | 7" |
| Chassis Weight | 380g | 149g | 149g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 63.2/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Which is better: Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 or Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 leads with an overall BeastScore of 63.2/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 63.2 vs top rival 60.8 and Larger battery capacity: 4,000 mAh (+920 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 is equipped with a 7-inch display and 4000 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) features a 5-inch display and 3080 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Galaxy Folder2
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)
BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Oppo A55s 2022 5G TD-LTE JP 64GB A102OP (BBK 2309)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 vs Galaxy Folder2
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Galaxy Folder2
Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Galaxy Tab CDMA P100 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.