BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Galaxy Tab E 9.6 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2015

Galaxy Tab E 9.6

Galaxy Tab E 9.6
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Xiaomi · 2014

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
61/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Galaxy Tab E 9.6 BETTER THAN Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Galaxy Tab E 9.6Winner 🏆
Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORGalaxy TabXiaomi Mi4LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh3,080 mAh+3,080 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor5 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size9.6"5"9.6"
Chassis Weight490g149g149g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Tab E 9.6:
  • ✓5MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓9.6" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo):
  • ✓341g lighter chassis (149g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓Larger 3,080 mAh battery capacity (+1,580 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓5" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Tab E 9.6Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy Tab E 9.6 Wins Display
Screen Type & TechTFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsColor IPS TFT LCD display
Screen Size9.6"5"
Resolution & Density800x1280 (157 ppi)1080x1920 (441 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Galaxy Tab E 9.6 Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory1 GB LPDDR3 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage2GB / 16GB16GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Tab E 9.6 Wins Camera
Primary Camera5 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens2 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight490 g149 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy Tab E 9.6 Wins Battery
Battery Capacity1,500 mAh3,080 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot - USA modelWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP; 4.1, A2DP - USA modelBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 edges ahead with a BeastScore of 60.8/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Galaxy Tab E 9.6 ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Galaxy Tab E 9.6:
Significantly larger display: 9.6" vs max 5" for media & multitasking
When to choose Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo):
Larger battery capacity: 3,080 mAh (+1,580 mAh more) · More system memory: 3GB RAM vs max 1GB
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Tab E 9.6 vs Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)

Which is better: Galaxy Tab E 9.6 or Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 leads with an overall BeastScore of 60.8/100 compared to Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) (60.8/100), driven by advantages in Significantly larger display: 9.6" vs max 5" for media & multitasking.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Tab E 9.6 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 is equipped with a 9.6-inch display and 1500 mAh battery, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) features a 5-inch display and 3080 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Tab E 9.6 and Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Tab E 9.6 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) scores 60/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Galaxy Folder2
Samsung

Galaxy Folder2

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Hongmi / Redmi 2013022 (Xiaomi Red Rice)

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y37L TD-LTE

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m
Oppo

Oppo A59 Dual SIM TD-LTE A59m

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Galaxy Folder2

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab E 9.6 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Xiaomi Mi4 4G TD-LTE 16GB 2014216 (Xiaomi Leo) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read Analysis →
Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4Update
4 min read

Xiaomi starts beta test recruitment for HyperOS 4

Xiaomi has started recruiting beta testers for HyperOS 4 across eligible flagship devices, focusing on smoother animations, lower background RAM usage, and improved AI features.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →