BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
Lab Benchmark Battle

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartphone Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung · 2014

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE
65/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
Samsung · 2022

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
66/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) BETTER THAN Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE
Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)Winner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORGalaxy TabSamsung SM-G736U1LEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity4,900 mAh4,050 mAh+4,900 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera Sensor8 MPN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size8.4"6.58"8.4"
Chassis Weight298g240g240g Lightest
Compare All 177+ Specifications Below↓

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE:
  • ✓Larger 4,900 mAh battery capacity (+850 mAh more capacity)
  • ✓8MP primary camera sensor with 4K/120fps video recording
  • ✓8.4" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736):
  • ✓58g lighter chassis (240g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • ✓6.58" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Tab S 8.4 LTESamsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)
1. Display & Screen🏆 Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE Wins Display
Screen Type & TechSuper AMOLED capacitive touchscreen, 16M colorsColor PLS TFT LCD display
Screen Size8.4"6.58"
Resolution & Density1600x2560 (359 ppi)1080x2408 (401 ppi)
Refresh Rate60 Hz ProMotion60 Hz
BrightnessN/AN/A
Screen ProtectionScratch-resistant glassScratch-resistant glass
2. Platform & Performance🏆 Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) Wins Performance
Chipset / ProcessorHigh performance SoC High performance SoC
CPU CoresMulti-core high performanceMulti-core high performance
GPU GraphicsIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Operating SystemAndroid Android
3. Memory & Storage
RAM Memory3 GB LPDDR6 GB LPDDR
Internal Storage3GB / 32GB128GB
Storage SpeedHigh-speed flashHigh-speed flash
Card SlotNoNo
4. Main Camera Optics🏆 Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE Wins Camera
Primary Camera8 MPN/A
Telephoto ZoomNone (Digital zoom only)None (Digital zoom only)
Ultrawide CameraN/AN/A
LiDAR / DepthNoneNone
5. Video Recording Capabilities
Main Camera Video
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
4K@60fps1080p@240fpsHDR
Front Video
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
4K@60fps1080p@60fpsgyro-EIS
6. Selfie Camera
Selfie Lens2.1 MPN/A
7. Body & Dimensions🏆 Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) Lightest Chassis
DimensionsN/AN/A
Weight298 g240 g
Build MaterialsGlass front, metal/glass frameGlass front, metal/glass frame
SIM TypeNano-SIM / eSIM supportNano-SIM / eSIM support
Water ResistanceNot certifiedNot certified
8. Battery & Charging🏆 Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE Wins Battery
Battery Capacity4,900 mAh4,050 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingN/AN/A
Wireless ChargingNot supportedNot supported
Reverse ChargingReverse wireless chargingReverse wireless charging
9. Sound & Audio
LoudspeakerStereo speakersStereo speakers
3.5mm Headphone JackNoNo
10. Connectivity & Comms
Wi-Fi StandardWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi 7 / 6E tri-band
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP, LEBluetooth 5.3+
USB Port & SpeedmicroUSB 2.0 (MHL), USB HostUSB Type-C
NFCYesYes
11. Sensors & Security
SensorsBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compassBiometric fingerprint/face, accelerometer, gyro, compass
Satellite FeaturesEmergency SOS via satellite (select markets)Emergency SOS via satellite (select markets)
12. Colors & Overview
ColorsStandard finishesStandard finishes
Launch PricePrice on requestPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.2/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE:
Larger battery capacity: 4,900 mAh (+850 mAh more) · Significantly larger display: 8.4" vs max 6.58" for media & multitasking
When to choose Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736):
Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 64.8 · More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 3GB
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE vs Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)

Which is better: Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE or Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.2/100 compared to Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE (64.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.2 vs top rival 64.8 and More system memory: 6GB RAM vs max 3GB.

What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE is equipped with a 8.4-inch display and 4900 mAh battery, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) features a 6.58-inch display and 4050 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE and Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736)?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE achieves a 60/100 performance score, while Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) scores 72/100.

Similar Hardware Tier

Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Samsung

Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Apple

Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Google

Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Oneplus

OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
Xiaomi

Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Vivo

BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB

A17k
Oppo

A17k

Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Related Showdowns

More Smartphones Battles

Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Galaxy Tab S 8.4 LTE vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Head-to-Head

Samsung SM-G736U1 Galaxy XCover6 Pro 5G 2022 Dual SIM TD-LTE US 128GB (Samsung G736) vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)

View Battle →
Editorial Coverage & Benchmarks

Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports

View All News →
Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbersComparison
6 min read

Apple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers

A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.

Read Analysis →
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)Flagship Showdown
14 min read

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.

Read Analysis →
Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)Definitive Wearable Benchmark
14 min read

Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)

An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.

Read Analysis →