Galaxy Tab S 8.4 vs BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
Galaxy Tab S 8.4
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
WHY IS BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB BETTER THAN Galaxy Tab S 8.4?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Galaxy Tab | BBK Vivo | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 4,900 mAh | 5,000 mAh | +5,000 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | 8 MP | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 8.4" | 6.51" | 8.4" |
| Chassis Weight | 294g | 178g | 178g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB edges ahead with a BeastScore of 66.4/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Tab S 8.4 vs BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB
Which is better: Galaxy Tab S 8.4 or BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB?
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB leads with an overall BeastScore of 66.4/100 compared to Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (64.8/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 66.4 vs top rival 64.8 and Lighter body: 178g (116g lighter in hand).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Tab S 8.4 and BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB?
Galaxy Tab S 8.4 is equipped with a 8.4-inch display and 4900 mAh battery, while BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB features a 6.51-inch display and 5000 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Tab S 8.4 and BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Tab S 8.4 achieves a 60/100 performance score, while BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB scores 60/100.
Related Smartphones (Based on Benchmark Scores)
Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Xiaomi Redmi A3x 4G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 64GB 24048RN6CG (Xiaomi Klein)
BBK Vivo Y02s 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V1 EMEA 32GB V2203 (BBK V2203)
A17k
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
More Smartphones Battles
Galaxy Tab S 8.4 vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB vs Samsung SM-G766N Galaxy XCover7 Pro 5G 2025 TD-LTE KR 128GB (Samsung G766)
Galaxy Tab S 8.4 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro 5G A3294 Dual SIM TD-LTE CN HK 256GB (Apple iPhone 17,1)
Galaxy Tab S 8.4 vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB vs Google Pixel 6a 5G TD-LTE NA 128GB GX7AS (Google Bluejay)
Galaxy Tab S 8.4 vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
BBK Vivo Y01 2022 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 NP BD KH VN 32GB vs OnePlus Nord N300 5G TD-LTE US 64GB CPH2389 (BBK 2339)
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Flagship ShowdownSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Honor Magic V3 vs. OnePlus Open: The Definitive Flagship Foldable Architecture, Hinge Engineering, Crease-Free Displays, and Camera Benchmark Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive microarchitectural breakdown, hinge mechanism stress-testing, crease analysis, dual-screen multitasking benchmarks, and periscope camera shootout across the 4 premier book-style foldables of 2026.
Definitive Wearable BenchmarkApple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Garmin Fenix 8: The Definitive Rugged Titanium Smartwatch Architecture, Dual-Frequency Multi-Band GPS Accuracy, AMOLED Displays, Scuba Dive Computers, and Extreme Battery Endurance Showdown (2026)
An exhaustive, laboratory-grade architectural deep dive and endurance benchmark comparing Apple's S9 SiP, Samsung's 3nm Exynos W1000, and Garmin's ultra-low-power MCU platform across multi-band GNSS tracking, 3000-nit displays, 40m scuba dive ratings, biometric sensors, and multi-week battery curves.