BeastCompare - Personal Tech Battles & Hardware Benchmarks
Home/Battles/Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Allwatch Hybrid T
Lab Benchmark Battle

Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Allwatch Hybrid T

Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.

Smartwatches Battle
Comparing 2 devicesSwipe across ⇄
Samsung

Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm)

Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm)
80/ 100
Launch MSRP$329 USD
Allview

Allwatch Hybrid T

Allwatch Hybrid T
82/ 100
Launch MSRPPricing on request
WHO WINS WHERE

WHY IS Allwatch Hybrid T BETTER THAN Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm)?

Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts

Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm)
Allwatch Hybrid TWinner 🏆

BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES

Margin Delta
SPEC FACTORGalaxy WatchAllwatch HybridLEADER
Refresh Rate60Hz60Hz60Hz
Battery Capacity270 mAh1,500 mAh+1,500 mAh
Wired Fast ChargingStandardStandard25W
Main Camera SensorN/AN/A48 MP
Screen Display Size1.2"1.22"1.22"
Chassis Weight49g88g49g Lightest

Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages

Swipe across ⇄
Reasons to buy Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm):
  • 39g lighter chassis (49g) optimized for one-handed ergonomics
  • $9670 lower launch MSRP ($329 vs $9999)
  • 1.2" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate
Reasons to buy Allwatch Hybrid T:
  • Larger 1,500 mAh battery capacity (+1,230 mAh more capacity)
  • 1.22" display with 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate

How Do the Specifications Compare Side-by-Side?

Swipe across ⇄
SpecificationGalaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm)Allwatch Hybrid T
1. Key Hardware Specifications (Smartwatches)
osTizenFeature phone
socExynos 9110Allview mobile platform 2018
ram gb0.751
displaySuper AMOLED 1.2" (360x360) 424 PPILCD touchscreen 1.22" (240x240) 278 PPI
weight g4988
ip ratingIP68
dimensions45.7 x 41.9 x 12.7 mm
os version4.0
battery mah2701500
connectivitynfc: true, wifi: 802.11 b/g/n, bluetooth: 4.2bluetooth: 4.2, A2DP, LE
release date2018-08-242018-01-01
storage options gb4
Launch MSRP$329 USDPrice on request
Editorial Lab Verdict

Allwatch Hybrid T edges ahead with a BeastScore of 82.0/100

After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Allwatch Hybrid T ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.

When to choose Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm):
Lighter body: 49g (39g lighter in hand) · Lower launch price: $329 (save $Infinity)
When to choose Allwatch Hybrid T:
Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 80.0 · Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,230 mAh more)
Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Allwatch Hybrid T

Which is better: Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) or Allwatch Hybrid T?

Allwatch Hybrid T leads with an overall BeastScore of 82.0/100 compared to Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) (80.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 82.0 vs top rival 80.0 and Larger battery capacity: 1,500 mAh (+1,230 mAh more).

What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) and Allwatch Hybrid T?

Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) is equipped with a 1.2-inch display and 270 mAh battery, while Allwatch Hybrid T features a 1.22-inch display and 1500 mAh battery.

How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) and Allwatch Hybrid T?

In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Allwatch Hybrid T scores 88/100.