Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Direct side-by-side battle analyzing hardware specifications, benchmark percentiles, battery endurance, and category performance advantages.
WHY IS Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) BETTER THAN Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm)?
Tap an area on the radar to inspect category hardware facts
BIGGEST HARDWARE DIFFERENCES
Margin Delta| SPEC FACTOR | Galaxy Watch | Samsung Galaxy | LEADER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Battery Capacity | 270 mAh | 590 mAh | +590 mAh |
| Wired Fast Charging | Standard | Standard | 25W |
| Main Camera Sensor | N/A | N/A | 48 MP |
| Screen Display Size | 1.2" | 1.5" | 1.5" |
| Chassis Weight | 49g | 605g | 49g Lightest |
Which Phone Should You Buy: Key Reasons & Hardware Advantages
Swipe across ⇄Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) edges ahead with a BeastScore of 92.0/100
After comprehensive hardware benchmark comparisons, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) ranks as the overall top pick in this matchup. Key differentiators include its superior specifications and verified build advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions: Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)
Which is better: Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) or Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) leads with an overall BeastScore of 92.0/100 compared to Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) (80.0/100), driven by advantages in Higher overall BeastScore: 92.0 vs top rival 80.0 and Larger battery capacity: 590 mAh (+320 mAh more).
What are the primary battery and display differences between Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) is equipped with a 1.2-inch display and 270 mAh battery, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) features a 1.5-inch display and 590 mAh battery.
How do the performance capabilities compare between Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm)?
In objective hardware benchmarks, Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) achieves a 88/100 performance score, while Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) scores 94/100.
Related Smartwatches (Based on Benchmark Scores)
More Smartwatches Battles
Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Honor Watch ES
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Honor Watch ES
Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Allview Allwatch
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch
Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid S
Galaxy Watch (Bluetooth, 42mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid T
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (LTE, 47mm) vs Allview Allwatch Hybrid T
Related In-Depth Articles & Lab Reports
ComparisonApple iPhone Duo vs Galaxy Z Fold8 by the numbers
A detailed spec-by-spec breakdown comparing the Apple iPhone Duo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 across screen area, hinge thickness, cameras, battery runtime, and pricing.
Hardware AnalysisApple Watch Series 12 & Ultra 4 Deep Dive: S11 Silicon, Next-Gen Health Sensing System, Audio Intelligence, and Ceramic Design Breakdown
An architectural deep dive into Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4: S11 SiP silicon, high-frequency optical PPG arrays, on-device Audio Intelligence, Longevity health age modeling, and the return of ceramic engineering.
Flagship GPU ArchitectureNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs. RTX 5080 Blackwell Architecture Deep Dive: GB202 vs GB203 Silicon, 32GB GDDR7, DLSS 4 Neural Rendering, and Definitive 4K Ray Tracing Benchmarks
An exhaustive silicon, GDDR7 memory subsystem, neural rendering, local AI LLM inferencing, and 4K path-tracing analysis comparing NVIDIA's flagship Blackwell graphics cards.